Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

Bibliographic Data

ID12945882
AuthorsМоsin (0000-0002-5936-3266, South Ural State University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume22
Issue3
Pages61-71
Publication date2023-03-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik NSU Series History and Philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1818-7919
PublisherNovosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-3-61-71
OpenAlexW4323309967
LanguageEN
References cited4

Purpose. At the end of the 20 th – beginning of the 21 st century, a generalization of all radiocarbon dates available at that time for the Eneolithic of the Trans-Urals forest and forest-steppe zone was carried out. Two stages were allocated – early and late, within the second half of the 5 th – 4 th millennium BC. However, an analysis of the differences be-tween the chronology of sites in the forest and forest-steppe zones was not carried out. The aim of this article is to analyze the presence of radiocarbon dates and chronological positions of Eneolithic sites in the forest zone of the Trans-Urals. Results. In the forest part of the Trans-Urals, more than 50 Eneolithic sites were studied and 55 radiocarbon dates were obtained for 26 of them. Dating of various types of archaeological sites has been carried out: sites and settlements, including peat bogs; the burial-cult site Skvortsovskaya Gora V and the cult object Koksharovsky Hill; burials; animal bones and wood tools; human bones and skulls. The results were obtained both by the traditional method (43 dates), and AMS (12 dates). Conventionally, all sites can be divided into two categories – with several dates and with single dates. Coverage categories: belonging to the early group; objects of late groups and objects that have dates of both early and late groups. Conclusion. Analysis of the presented materials showed the presence of early complexes – the second half of the 5 th – the first quarter of the 4th millennium BC (12 objects), and the late ones – the second half of the 4 th – the beginning of the 3 rd millennium BC (8 objects). It is also necessary to note a number of sites that have both early and late dates (7 objects). Another attempt to establish the Eneolithic sites periodization according to cultural traditions (e.g. ceramic complexes differences) was not successful. Traditional for the Trans-Urals ceramic complexes: with comb simple (linear) and geometric ornamentation, false cord (Lipchinskaya), Sosnovoostrovskaya, Shuvakishskaya and Shapkulskaya, present as in the early and in late complexes

Archaeology · Beaker · Bronze Age · Chalcolithic · Chronology · Geography · Peat · Radiocarbon dating · Steppe · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology

  • Neolithic and eneolithic complexes of site Kedroviy mys-1 in South Trans-Urals

    Open Access•Моsin, A Strahov•Bulletin of the South Ural State…•2017

  • Radiocarbon Chronology of the Mesolithic, Neolithic, Aeneolithic, and Bronze Age Sites in the Trans-Urals (Russia)

    Open Access•Natalia M Chairkina, Y V Kuzmin et al.•Radiocarbon•2017

  • Chronology of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age in the Urals1

    Open Access•Моsin, Mosin et al.•Archaeology Ethnology and…•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae