Gregory M Hurtz
Biographic Data
| ID | 9251574 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gregory M Hurtz |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gregory M |
| FAMILY NAME | Hurtz |
| SIGNATURE | HURTZ G M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Excelsior College |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5061-9202 |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1999 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Modifications to the Angoff Method on Cutoff Scores and Judgment Consensus
The Angoff method for setting cutoff scores on examinations has been researched extensively over the past 30 years, including investigations of several procedural modifications to the method. In the current study, the authors meta-analytically synthesized this research and evaluated the systematic effects of the most common modifications on the level of the resulting cutoff scores and the degree of consensus among judges. The authors found the fo…
Personality and job performance
Prior meta-analyses investigating the relation between the Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance have all contained a threat to construct validity, in that much of the data included within these analyses was not derived from actual Big 5 measures. In addition, these reviews did not address the relations between the Big 5 and contextual performance. Therefore, the present study sought to provide a meta-analytic estimate of the criterion…
How Many Raters Should be Used for Establishing Cutoff Scores with the Angoff Method? a Generalizability Theory Study
Although the Angoff method is perhaps the most highly regarded and widely used judgmental method for setting criterion-referenced cutoff scores, little research has been conducted to determine the optimal number of raters to employ for obtaining stable cutoff scores. In the present study, Angoff ratings obtained from eight different occupational licensing examinations were evaluated via generalizability theory to estimate the optimal number of ra…
No prominent works on this page.
How Many Raters Should be Used for Establishing Cutoff Scores with the Angoff Method? a Generalizability Theory Study
Although the Angoff method is perhaps the most highly regarded and widely used judgmental method for setting criterion-referenced cutoff scores, little research has been conducted to determine the optimal number of raters to employ for obtaining stable cutoff scores. In the present study, Angoff ratings obtained from eight different occupational licensing examinations were evaluated via generalizability theory to estimate the optimal number of ra…
Personality and job performance
Prior meta-analyses investigating the relation between the Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance have all contained a threat to construct validity, in that much of the data included within these analyses was not derived from actual Big 5 measures. In addition, these reviews did not address the relations between the Big 5 and contextual performance. Therefore, the present study sought to provide a meta-analytic estimate of the criterion…
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Modifications to the Angoff Method on Cutoff Scores and Judgment Consensus
The Angoff method for setting cutoff scores on examinations has been researched extensively over the past 30 years, including investigations of several procedural modifications to the method. In the current study, the authors meta-analytically synthesized this research and evaluated the systematic effects of the most common modifications on the level of the resulting cutoff scores and the degree of consensus among judges. The authors found the fo…
Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Cutoff (2 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 works) · Statistics (2 works) · Applied Psychology (1 work) · Big data (1 work) · Big Five personality traits (1 work)