Martin Szomszor
Biographic Data
| ID | 9458125 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Martin Szomszor |
| GIVEN NAMES | Martin |
| FAMILY NAME | Szomszor |
| SIGNATURE | SZOMSZOR M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ta Solutions (China) |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0347-3527 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
How Universities Justify their Worth
Organisations increasingly operate under conditions of evaluative pluralism, in which they must justify their worth to multiple audiences according to potentially competing criteria. Research universities provide a revealing empirical case, as they face conflicting expectations around advancing knowledge, serving democracy, driving innovation, and contributing to economic growth. This article analyses strategic plans as cultural artefacts through…
National research impact is driven by global collaboration, not rising performance
We examine the link between a country’s average citation impact and both national research assessment and international collaboration. Our analysis finds little synchrony between national policies and performance change. We do find extensive, synchronous, cross-national change, however, despite a diversity of national research strategies. Specifically, during 1981–2020, there are synchronous cross-national changes in bilateral, and later multilat…
Comparing standard, collaboration and fractional CNCI at the institutional level
The average Category Normalised Citation Impact (CNCI) of an institution’s publication output is a widely used indicator for research performance benchmarking. However, it combines all entity contributions, obscuring individual inputs and preventing clear insight and sound policy recommendations if it is not correctly understood. Here, variations (Fractional and Collaboration [Collab] CNCI)—which aim to address the obscurity problem—are compared …
Overton
This paper presents an analysis of the Overton policy document database, describing the makeup of materials indexed and the nature in which they cite academic literature. We report on various aspects of the data, including growth, geographic spread, language representation, the range of policy source types included, and the availability of citation links in documents. Longitudinal analysis over established journal category schemes is used to reve…
A converging global research system
We examine the hypothesis that research collaboration has enabled a global research network to evolve, with self-organizing properties transcending national research policy. We examine research output, bilateral and multilateral collaboration, subject diversity, and citation impact over 40 years, in detail for the G7 and BRICK groups of countries and in summary for 26 other nations. We find that the rise in national output was strongly associated…
Sample size in bibliometric analysis
While bibliometric analysis is normally able to rely on complete publication sets this is not universally the case. For example, Australia (in ERA) and the UK (in the RAE/REF) use institutional research assessment that may rely on small or fractional parts of researcher output. Using the Category Normalised Citation Impact (CNCI) for the publications of ten universities with similar output (21,000–28,000 articles and reviews) indexed in the Web o…
How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess
Citations can be an indicator of publication significance, utility, attention, visibility or short-term impact but analysts need to confirm whether a high citation count for an individual is a genuine reflection of influence or a consequence of extraordinary, even excessive, self-citation. It has recently been suggested there may be increasing misrepresentation of research performance by individuals who self-cite inordinately to achieve scores an…
Longitudinal variation in national research publication portfolios
National research diversity is explored through the balance of global and national papers in journal categories in the Web of Science (WoS) and Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and we examine the consequences of “normalizing” national publication counts against global baselines. Global balance across subject categories became more even as annual WoS indexing grew fourfold between 1981 and 2018, with a relative shift from biomedicine towards env…
No prominent works on this page.
Sample size in bibliometric analysis
While bibliometric analysis is normally able to rely on complete publication sets this is not universally the case. For example, Australia (in ERA) and the UK (in the RAE/REF) use institutional research assessment that may rely on small or fractional parts of researcher output. Using the Category Normalised Citation Impact (CNCI) for the publications of ten universities with similar output (21,000–28,000 articles and reviews) indexed in the Web o…
How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess
Citations can be an indicator of publication significance, utility, attention, visibility or short-term impact but analysts need to confirm whether a high citation count for an individual is a genuine reflection of influence or a consequence of extraordinary, even excessive, self-citation. It has recently been suggested there may be increasing misrepresentation of research performance by individuals who self-cite inordinately to achieve scores an…
Longitudinal variation in national research publication portfolios
National research diversity is explored through the balance of global and national papers in journal categories in the Web of Science (WoS) and Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and we examine the consequences of “normalizing” national publication counts against global baselines. Global balance across subject categories became more even as annual WoS indexing grew fourfold between 1981 and 2018, with a relative shift from biomedicine towards env…
Comparing standard, collaboration and fractional CNCI at the institutional level
The average Category Normalised Citation Impact (CNCI) of an institution’s publication output is a widely used indicator for research performance benchmarking. However, it combines all entity contributions, obscuring individual inputs and preventing clear insight and sound policy recommendations if it is not correctly understood. Here, variations (Fractional and Collaboration [Collab] CNCI)—which aim to address the obscurity problem—are compared …
Overton
This paper presents an analysis of the Overton policy document database, describing the makeup of materials indexed and the nature in which they cite academic literature. We report on various aspects of the data, including growth, geographic spread, language representation, the range of policy source types included, and the availability of citation links in documents. Longitudinal analysis over established journal category schemes is used to reve…
A converging global research system
We examine the hypothesis that research collaboration has enabled a global research network to evolve, with self-organizing properties transcending national research policy. We examine research output, bilateral and multilateral collaboration, subject diversity, and citation impact over 40 years, in detail for the G7 and BRICK groups of countries and in summary for 26 other nations. We find that the rise in national output was strongly associated…
National research impact is driven by global collaboration, not rising performance
We examine the link between a country’s average citation impact and both national research assessment and international collaboration. Our analysis finds little synchrony between national policies and performance change. We do find extensive, synchronous, cross-national change, however, despite a diversity of national research strategies. Specifically, during 1981–2020, there are synchronous cross-national changes in bilateral, and later multilat…
How Universities Justify their Worth
Organisations increasingly operate under conditions of evaluative pluralism, in which they must justify their worth to multiple audiences according to potentially competing criteria. Research universities provide a revealing empirical case, as they face conflicting expectations around advancing knowledge, serving democracy, driving innovation, and contributing to economic growth. This article analyses strategic plans as cultural artefacts through…
Computer Science (7 works) · scientometrics and bibliometrics research (7 works) · Citation (6 works) · Library science (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Economics (5 works) · Regional science (4 works) · Bibliometrics (3 works) · Citation impact (3 works) · Geography (3 works)