Ruth Wedgwood
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1010792 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Ruth Wedgwood |
| PRENOMES | Ruth |
| SOBRENOME | Wedgwood |
| ASSINATURA | WEDGWOOD R |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of Southern California |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1391-2407 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 54 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 170 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 54 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1970 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 8 |
Pricean ignorance
Richard Price’s moral epistemology provides a distinctive account, not only of the sources of our moral knowledge, but also of its limits – that is, of the moral truths that we do not and even cannot know. According to this moral epistemology, the fundamental moral truths are necessary rather than contingent; if they are knowable at all, they are knowable a priori. In general, fundamental moral truths are akin to mathematical truths. Specifically…
Can our reasons determine what it is rational for us to believe
Ethical Naturalism, Non-Naturalism, and In-Between
This chapter explores the issues surrounding ethical “naturalism” and “non-naturalism.” First, it seeks to clarify (a) the fundamental questions on the metaphysical side of metaethics, and (b) the most illuminating way (in this context) of conceiving of what is “natural.” Then the two dominant approaches in this debate are explained—reductive naturalism and primitivist non-naturalism. It is argued that each of these two paradigms is in a way an e…
The sources of moral knowledge
Does moral knowledge require a special or distinctive epistemology? Or is it enough just to develop a general account of knowledge and justified belief, which can then just be applied to our moral beliefs? Among those theorists who have searched for a special epistemology for moral beliefs, one common idea is that moral knowledge has a distinctive fundamental source. In particular, according to many of these theorists, there are certain special m…
The Reasons Aggregation Theorem
Often, when one faces a choice between alternative actions, there are reasons both for and against each alternative. On one way of understanding these words, what one “ought to do all things considered (ATC)” is determined by the totality of these reasons. So, these reasons can somehow be “combined” or “aggregated” to yield an ATC verdict on these alternatives. First, in this chapter, various assumptions about this sort of aggregation of reasons …
The internalist virtue theory of knowledge
The Coherence Of Thrasymachus
This essay gives an interpretation of the character of Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic . Contrary to what recent commentators have claimed, Plato presents Thrasymachus as a horrifying figure, with a dark but coherent view of human life. According to this view, the principal good in life is domination over others: so in every significant interaction, one party is the winner, while the other is the loser. Justice is the vice of foolishly losing ou…
Plato’s Theory of Knowledge
Several contemporary epistemologists have been intrigued by the discussion of the distinction between knowledge and correct opinion in Plato’s Meno (97a–98b); a number of them have suggested that Plato is appealing to the idea that to know a proposition one must be ‘safe from error’ regarding that proposition. In fact, although there is evidence that Plato assumes that knowledge requires something like safety, this passage in the Meno imposes a d…
The Unity of Normativity
What is normativity? It is argued here that normativity is best understood as a property of certain concepts: normative thoughts are those involving these normative concepts; normative statements are statements that express normative thoughts; and normative facts are the facts (if such there be) that make such normative thoughts true. Many philosophers propose that there is a single basic normative concept—perhaps the concept of a reason for an a…
Must rational intentions maximize utility
Suppose that it is rational to choose or intend a course of action if and only if the course of action maximizes some sort of expectation of some sort of value. What sort of value should this definition appeal to? According to an influential neo-Humean view, the answer is “Utility”, where utility is defined as a measure of subjective preference. According to a rival neo-Aristotelian view, the answer is “Choiceworthiness”, where choiceworthiness i…
The Value of Rationality
Rationality is a central concept for epistemology, ethics, and the study of practical reason. But what sort of concept is it? It is argued here that—contrary to objections that have recently been raised—rationality is a normative concept. In general, normative concepts cannot be explained in terms of the concepts expressed by ‘reasons’ or ‘ought’. Instead, normative concepts are best understood in terms of values . Thus, for a mental state or a p…
Being Realistic about Reasons
T. M. Scanlon is a towering figure in moral and political philosophy. His three earlier books and his numerous seminal articles, stretching back over 40 years, are well known to everyone who has a serious interest in these subjects. In this new book, based on the Locke Lectures that he gave in Oxford in 2009, he turns his attention to metaethics—that is, to questions about the semantics, philosophical psychology, metaphysics, and epistemology of …
Gandalf’s solution to the Newcomb problem
Justified inference
Scanlon on Double Effect
Democracies, Human Rights, and Collective Action
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Diotima's Eudaemonism
This paper gives a new interpretation of the central section of Plato's Symposium (199d-212a). According to this interpretation, the term "καλóν", as used by Plato here, stands for what many contemporary philosophers call "intrinsic value"; and "love" (ερωζ) is in effect rational motivation, which for Plato consists in the desire to "possess" intrinsically valuable things – that is, according to Plato, to be happy – for as long as possible. An ex…
The “Good” and the “Right” Revisited 1
The Nature of Normativity
This book presents a complete theory about the nature of normative thought, that is, the sort of thought that is concerned with what ought to be the case, or what we ought to do or think. This theory implies a kind of metanormative realism, according to which normative truths or facts are genuinely part of reality. At the same time, the theory aims to provide a substantive account of the nature of these normative facts, and a substantive explanat…
Christopher Peacocke’s The Realm of Reason
Education and poverty reduction in Tanzania
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Israeli Security Fence and the Limits of Self-Defense
On December 8, 2003, the International Court of Justice was requested by the United Nations General Assembly to give an advisory opinion on the “legal consequences” of the security fence under construction by Israel in the West Bank, also variously called “security barrier” and “wall.” The General Assembly sought referral to the Court by a vote of 90 states—but another 74 states abstained, and 8 states voted in opposition. Careful consideration o…
The Metaethicists’ Mistake 1
Fighting a War under Its Rules [with Reply]
The Fall of Saddam Hussein
At long last, the people of Iraq are freed from the brutality of Saddam Hussein. The swift success of the coalition’s military campaign has been followed by predictable difficulties in organizing a hew government, restoring an economy, rebuilding civic society, and quelling violence from remnants of the old regime. But these challenges are kept in scale by recalling a dictator who murdered three hundred thousand fellow citizens. Saddam chose weap…
Education and poverty reduction in Tanzania
The Fall of Saddam Hussein
At long last, the people of Iraq are freed from the brutality of Saddam Hussein. The swift success of the coalition’s military campaign has been followed by predictable difficulties in organizing a hew government, restoring an economy, rebuilding civic society, and quelling violence from remnants of the old regime. But these challenges are kept in scale by recalling a dictator who murdered three hundred thousand fellow citizens. Saddam chose weap…
Justified inference
The Value of Rationality
Rationality is a central concept for epistemology, ethics, and the study of practical reason. But what sort of concept is it? It is argued here that—contrary to objections that have recently been raised—rationality is a normative concept. In general, normative concepts cannot be explained in terms of the concepts expressed by ‘reasons’ or ‘ought’. Instead, normative concepts are best understood in terms of values . Thus, for a mental state or a p…
The International Criminal Court
The international community has been chastened by the recent record of brutal civil wars. Violation of humanitarian standards has become a tactic of war. The attempt to strengthen enforcement of the law of war through a permanent international criminal court is thus a signal event. The negotiations conducted in Rome in 1998 did not solve all the difficulties that attend a permanent court. These include the problem of amnesties in democratic trans…
The A Priori Rules of Rationality
Both these ideas are intuitively plausible: rationality has an external aim, such as forming a true belief or good decision; and the rationality of a belief or decision is determined purely by facts about the thinker's internal mental states. Unlike earlier conceptions, the conception of rationality presented here explains why these ideas are both true. Rational beliefs and decisions, it is argued, are those that are formed through the thinker's …
Nato’s Campaign in Yugoslavia
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms
Research Article| January 01 2001 Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms Ralph Wedgwood Ralph Wedgwood Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-1-1 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Sit…
Gandalf’s solution to the Newcomb problem
Practical Reason and Desire
2002). Practical Reason and Desire. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 345-358
Must rational intentions maximize utility
Suppose that it is rational to choose or intend a course of action if and only if the course of action maximizes some sort of expectation of some sort of value. What sort of value should this definition appeal to? According to an influential neo-Humean view, the answer is “Utility”, where utility is defined as a measure of subjective preference. According to a rival neo-Aristotelian view, the answer is “Choiceworthiness”, where choiceworthiness i…
Al Qaeda, Terrorism, and Military Commissions
It is now more than an academic question whether one should regard terrorism as crime or as war. The attacks mounted by the Al Qaeda organization on September 11, 2001, were of unprecedented scale, heretofore seen only in wartime, killing three thousand people in a few hours’ time. Most victims were civilians, and most were Americans, yet the dead included people from eighty-seven countries. Had the emergency evacuation of the World Trade Center …
Practical Reasoning as Figuring Out What is Best
Sensing Values
The Enforcement of Security Council Resolution 687
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Scanlon on Double Effect
The “Good” and the “Right” Revisited 1
Diotima's Eudaemonism
This paper gives a new interpretation of the central section of Plato's Symposium (199d-212a). According to this interpretation, the term "καλóν", as used by Plato here, stands for what many contemporary philosophers call "intrinsic value"; and "love" (ερωζ) is in effect rational motivation, which for Plato consists in the desire to "possess" intrinsically valuable things – that is, according to Plato, to be happy – for as long as possible. An ex…
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Israeli Security Fence and the Limits of Self-Defense
On December 8, 2003, the International Court of Justice was requested by the United Nations General Assembly to give an advisory opinion on the “legal consequences” of the security fence under construction by Israel in the West Bank, also variously called “security barrier” and “wall.” The General Assembly sought referral to the Court by a vote of 90 states—but another 74 states abstained, and 8 states voted in opposition. Careful consideration o…
Fiddling in Rome
Court as a key aim of American foreign policy. And yet in July 1998, when the draft treaty to create the ice was approved in Rome, the United States found itself in a nasty minority, siding with Libya, Iraq, Yemen, and Qatar against the court. (The final vote was 120 in favor, 7 opposed, and 21 abstentions.) Some of Washington's concerns were serious and legitimate. American troops are deployed across the globe, and should not face the added dang…
The internalist virtue theory of knowledge
The Unity of Normativity
What is normativity? It is argued here that normativity is best understood as a property of certain concepts: normative thoughts are those involving these normative concepts; normative statements are statements that express normative thoughts; and normative facts are the facts (if such there be) that make such normative thoughts true. Many philosophers propose that there is a single basic normative concept—perhaps the concept of a reason for an a…
Gallant Delusions
The Fundamental Argument for Same‐Sex Marriage
Non-Cognitivism, Truth and Logic
Examination of the changes in the United States which affect the health of children and youth
OUR purpose is to identify and discuss those changes in the United States that are affecting the health of children and youth. Insofar as it is possible, we will look behind these changes for the forces that are bringing them about. Change is a process of response to a variety of forces, many of which are not readily seen as having an impact on the health of children and youth. Similarly, the changes that can be visualized are often not nearly as…
Infants, mothers and doctors
The Revolutionary Martyrdom of Jonathan Robbins
If you had been as Robbins wasWhat would you have done?What ought you not to do?And look at Robbins, Hanging at a British Yard-arm!!He was your fellow-citizen, And as brave a heart
Scepticism and Rational Belief
Journal Article Scepticism and Rational Belief Get access Ralph Wedgwood Ralph Wedgwood Kings College, London Cornell University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 158, January 1990, Pages 45–64, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219966 Published: 01 January 1990
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice
Ruth Millikan's extended argument for a biological view of the study of cognition in Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories caught the attention of the philosophical community. Universally regarded as an important, even brilliant, work, its complexity and dense presentation made it difficult to plumb. This collection of essays serves both as an introduction to that much discussed volume and as an extension and application of Millikan'…
R. v. Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Bennett
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Non-Cognitivism, Truth and Logic
Case Analysis
In a world of sovereign states, gathering evidence is one of the major challenges for the new international criminal tribunals. The decision in Prosecutor v. Blaškić, by the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, shows some of the difficulties. The Tribunal finds it has the power to issue compulsory orders to sovereign states for the production of evidence, although not to issue a subpoena as such. The T…
Value Judgement
The Enforcement of Security Council Resolution 687
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Fiddling in Rome
Court as a key aim of American foreign policy. And yet in July 1998, when the draft treaty to create the ice was approved in Rome, the United States found itself in a nasty minority, siding with Libya, Iraq, Yemen, and Qatar against the court. (The final vote was 120 in favor, 7 opposed, and 21 abstentions.) Some of Washington's concerns were serious and legitimate. American troops are deployed across the globe, and should not face the added dang…
The Fundamental Argument for Same‐Sex Marriage
The International Criminal Court
The international community has been chastened by the recent record of brutal civil wars. Violation of humanitarian standards has become a tactic of war. The attempt to strengthen enforcement of the law of war through a permanent international criminal court is thus a signal event. The negotiations conducted in Rome in 1998 did not solve all the difficulties that attend a permanent court. These include the problem of amnesties in democratic trans…
The A Priori Rules of Rationality
Both these ideas are intuitively plausible: rationality has an external aim, such as forming a true belief or good decision; and the rationality of a belief or decision is determined purely by facts about the thinker's internal mental states. Unlike earlier conceptions, the conception of rationality presented here explains why these ideas are both true. Rational beliefs and decisions, it is argued, are those that are formed through the thinker's …
Procure-All
Nato’s Campaign in Yugoslavia
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Unilateral action in the UN system
Realization of UN Charter values has required adaptation of its procedures in the face of Cold War politics and conflicts of national self-interest. Security Council machinery has never worked quite as planned. 'Recommendations' for the use of force have substituted when Article 43 agreements were not forthcoming and direct enforcement action was unavailable. 'Abstentions' by permanent members of the Council have been counted as 'concurrences' to…
Trouble in Timor
Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms
Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms
Research Article| January 01 2001 Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms Ralph Wedgwood Ralph Wedgwood Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-1-1 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Sit…
Sensing Values
Fact and Value
The diversity of topics discussed in this book reflects the breadth of Judith Jarvis Thomson's philosophical work. Throughout her long career at MIT, Thomson's straightforward approach and emphasis on problem-solving have shaped philosophy in significant ways. Some of the book's contributions discuss specific moral and political issues such as abortion, self-defense, the rights and obligations of prospective fathers, and political campaign financ…
The Law's Response to September 11
It is hard to watch a society's political virtues mocked as weakness by an uncomprehending foe. The fireball attacks of September 11 against the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon consumed the lives of more than 3,000 ordinary people—Americans and foreign visitors , business people, secretaries, schoolchildren visiting the Pentagon, travelers flying home. Like Joseph Conrad's terrorist who wished to destroy pure mathematics and settled fo…
Al Qaeda, Military Commissions, and American Self-Defense
Journal Article Al Qaeda, Military Commissions, and American Self-Defense Get access Ruth Wedgwood Ruth Wedgwood RUTH WEDGWOOD is professor of law at Yale and Johns Hopkins universities and a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. She has served on the secretary of state's advisory committee on international law and as an independent expert for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. Se…
Epistemology (27 obras) · Political science (27 obras) · Philosophy (25 obras) · Law (18 obras) · Law (18 obras) · Computer Science (17 obras) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (17 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 obras) · Philosophy (15 obras) · Politics (11 obras)