Fiddling in Rome

Court as a key aim of American foreign policy. And yet in July 1998, when the draft treaty to create the ice was approved in Rome, the United States found itself in a nasty minority, siding with Libya, Iraq, Yemen, and Qatar against the court. (The final vote was 120 in favor, 7 opposed, and 21 abstentions.) Some of Washington's concerns were serious and legitimate. American troops are deployed across the globe, and should not face the added danger of politically motivated prosecutions. But the administration failed to think

Criminal court · Criminology · International law · Political science · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law

• Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice

  Leslie Vinjamuri, Jack Snyder•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  Incluir item

• International Criminal Court

  Open Access•Vesselin Popovski•Security Dialogue•2000

  Incluir item

• Kritik der transnationalen Gewalt

  Open Access•Claas Christophersen•Kritik der transnationalen Gewalt•2009

  Incluir item

• Reckoning with Past Wrongs

  Open Access•David A Crocker•Ethics & International Affairs•1999

  Incluir item

• United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol

  Open Access•Martijn Groenleer, Martijn L P Groenleer et al.•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2007

  Incluir item

• Human Rights versus National Interests

  Open Access•Kelebogile Zvobgo•International Studies Quarterly•2019

  Incluir item

• Explaining the International Criminal Court

  Open Access•Caroline Fehl•European Journal of International…•2004

  Incluir item