Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Geoffrey Sheagley

Dados Biográficos

ID1020430
NOMEGeoffrey Sheagley
PRENOMESGeoffrey
SOBRENOMESheagley
ASSINATURASHEAGLEY G
AFILIAÇÕESUniversity of Georgia
ORCID0000-0002-1743-6201
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS13
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES259
OBRAS COMO AUTOR13
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2013
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2025
ÍNDICE H6
  • No Evidence that Measuring Moderators Alters Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Clifford•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2025•Citada por: 19•Referências: 66

    Social scientists are frequently interested in who is most responsive to a treatment. By necessity, such moderation experiments often rely on observed moderators, such as partisan identity. These designs have led to an ongoing debate about where to measure moderators—immediately prior to the treatment, after the treatment, or in a prior wave of a panel survey. Measuring a moderator prior to the treatment is the most efficient and avoids posttreat…

  • Partisan Poll Watchers and Americans’ Perceptions of Electoral Fairness

    Open Access•Mollie J Cohen, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024•Referências: 47

    Poll watchers play an increasingly visible role in American elections, yet there is little research into how their presence shapes beliefs about electoral integrity. On the one hand, poll watchers—like other election observers—may lead voters to be more trusting in elections. On the other hand, poll watchers who expressly represent political parties may contribute to polarized views of electoral integrity. We address this gap with two conjoint ex…

  • The Personal Vote in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, John Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2024•Citada por: 4•Referências: 40

    This study offers experimental tests of the “personal vote” in an era of heightened partisanship and polarization. Using three national surveys, we randomly present information about a hypothetical legislator's voting record, committee assignment, and district‐oriented work. After evaluating the legislator, respondents are presented with information about a challenger running on a nationalized message. Respondents, especially out‐partisans, repor…

  • Tolerance for the Free Speech of Outgroup Partisans

    Open Access•R F Carlos, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2023•Referências: 6

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Trade politics at the checkout lane

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert, Rosemary Powers et al.•ARTICLE•Political Science Research and…•2023•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    As international trade flourishes, Americans can choose from an increasing number of foreign products even at their local grocery stores, allowing consumers to directly experience the consequences of globalized trade in a simple and intuitive way that does not require much political expertise. Yet, most prior scholarship on political consumerism assumes that consumers are aware of the political and economic implications of their choices at the ch…

  • A Good Partisan? Ideology, Loyalty, and Public Evaluations of Members of Congress

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Logan Dancey et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023•Citada por: 2•Referências: 22

    In recent years, legislators from both parties have drawn attention for their public support or opposition to leading figures within their party, such as Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi. Yet we know relatively little about the extent to which voters care about members' professed loyalty to party leaders, especially when compared to competing considerations such as members' policy positions. In two national survey experiments, we independently manip…

  • Primary Divisions

    John Henderson, John A Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2022•Citada por: 8•Referências: 33

    While central to theories of polarization and primary elections, surprisingly little evidence shows that partisans favor candidates who take ideologically consistent issue positions, above other considerations, in intraparty contests. In this study, we investigate how voters weigh policy and nonpolicy differences when evaluating same-party politicians, using novel conjoint experiments that manipulate the demographic, biographical, and issue infor…

  • Multiple meanings? The link between partisanship and definitions of voter fraud

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Adriano Udani•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2021•Citada por: 11•Referências: 25

  • Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Clifford, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2021•Citada por: 108•Referências: 56

    The use of survey experiments has surged in political science. The most common design is the between-subjects design in which the outcome is only measured posttreatment. This design relies heavily on recruiting a large number of subjects to precisely estimate treatment effects. Alternative designs that involve repeated measurements of the dependent variable promise greater precision, but they are rarely used out of fears that these designs will y…

  • Partisanship and Perceptions of Party-Line Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2018•Citada por: 5•Referências: 50

    This paper explores public perceptions of congressional partisanship in an era of polarized parties. We use data from a module on the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) that asks respondents about the voting behavior of their legislators. Our results show that individuals underestimate the extent to which legislators from their own party vote the party line—even when primed with information about high levels of party-line voting…

  • The effect of cross-cutting partisan debates on political decision-making

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2017•Citada por: 1•Referências: 22

    Party identification provides citizens with an anchor from which they derive many of their political attitudes and issue preferences. But what happens when people encounter political debates that place their partisan identities and policy attitudes into conflict with one another? This article draws on an original experiment designed to study the effect of debates that cut across people’s partisan identities and policy attitudes. The results show …

  • Inferences Made Easy

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2016•Citada por: 10•Referências: 42

    This article investigates whether constituents are able to accurately infer their senators’ votes when the senator frequently votes against the party line. We find that when senators repeatedly vote against the party line, constituents’ ability to correctly identify their senators’ votes drops precipitously while levels of misinformation rise. We then show that citizens represented by senators who tend to vote against the party line are also less…

  • Heuristics Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2013•Citada por: 88•Referências: 35

    Party cues provide citizens with low‐cost information about their representatives’ policy positions. But what happens when elected officials deviate from the party line? Relying on the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we examine citizens’ knowledge of their senators’ positions on seven high‐profile roll‐call votes. We find that although politically interested citizens are the group most likely to know their senator's position…

  • Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Clifford, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2021•Citada por: 108•Referências: 56

    The use of survey experiments has surged in political science. The most common design is the between-subjects design in which the outcome is only measured posttreatment. This design relies heavily on recruiting a large number of subjects to precisely estimate treatment effects. Alternative designs that involve repeated measurements of the dependent variable promise greater precision, but they are rarely used out of fears that these designs will y…

  • Heuristics Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2013•Citada por: 88•Referências: 35

    Party cues provide citizens with low‐cost information about their representatives’ policy positions. But what happens when elected officials deviate from the party line? Relying on the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we examine citizens’ knowledge of their senators’ positions on seven high‐profile roll‐call votes. We find that although politically interested citizens are the group most likely to know their senator's position…

  • No Evidence that Measuring Moderators Alters Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Clifford•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2025•Citada por: 19•Referências: 66

    Social scientists are frequently interested in who is most responsive to a treatment. By necessity, such moderation experiments often rely on observed moderators, such as partisan identity. These designs have led to an ongoing debate about where to measure moderators—immediately prior to the treatment, after the treatment, or in a prior wave of a panel survey. Measuring a moderator prior to the treatment is the most efficient and avoids posttreat…

  • Multiple meanings? The link between partisanship and definitions of voter fraud

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Adriano Udani•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2021•Citada por: 11•Referências: 25

  • Inferences Made Easy

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2016•Citada por: 10•Referências: 42

    This article investigates whether constituents are able to accurately infer their senators’ votes when the senator frequently votes against the party line. We find that when senators repeatedly vote against the party line, constituents’ ability to correctly identify their senators’ votes drops precipitously while levels of misinformation rise. We then show that citizens represented by senators who tend to vote against the party line are also less…

  • Primary Divisions

    John Henderson, John A Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2022•Citada por: 8•Referências: 33

    While central to theories of polarization and primary elections, surprisingly little evidence shows that partisans favor candidates who take ideologically consistent issue positions, above other considerations, in intraparty contests. In this study, we investigate how voters weigh policy and nonpolicy differences when evaluating same-party politicians, using novel conjoint experiments that manipulate the demographic, biographical, and issue infor…

  • Partisanship and Perceptions of Party-Line Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2018•Citada por: 5•Referências: 50

    This paper explores public perceptions of congressional partisanship in an era of polarized parties. We use data from a module on the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) that asks respondents about the voting behavior of their legislators. Our results show that individuals underestimate the extent to which legislators from their own party vote the party line—even when primed with information about high levels of party-line voting…

  • The Personal Vote in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, John Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2024•Citada por: 4•Referências: 40

    This study offers experimental tests of the “personal vote” in an era of heightened partisanship and polarization. Using three national surveys, we randomly present information about a hypothetical legislator's voting record, committee assignment, and district‐oriented work. After evaluating the legislator, respondents are presented with information about a challenger running on a nationalized message. Respondents, especially out‐partisans, repor…

  • Trade politics at the checkout lane

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert, Rosemary Powers et al.•ARTICLE•Political Science Research and…•2023•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    As international trade flourishes, Americans can choose from an increasing number of foreign products even at their local grocery stores, allowing consumers to directly experience the consequences of globalized trade in a simple and intuitive way that does not require much political expertise. Yet, most prior scholarship on political consumerism assumes that consumers are aware of the political and economic implications of their choices at the ch…

  • A Good Partisan? Ideology, Loyalty, and Public Evaluations of Members of Congress

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Logan Dancey et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023•Citada por: 2•Referências: 22

    In recent years, legislators from both parties have drawn attention for their public support or opposition to leading figures within their party, such as Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi. Yet we know relatively little about the extent to which voters care about members' professed loyalty to party leaders, especially when compared to competing considerations such as members' policy positions. In two national survey experiments, we independently manip…

  • The effect of cross-cutting partisan debates on political decision-making

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2017•Citada por: 1•Referências: 22

    Party identification provides citizens with an anchor from which they derive many of their political attitudes and issue preferences. But what happens when people encounter political debates that place their partisan identities and policy attitudes into conflict with one another? This article draws on an original experiment designed to study the effect of debates that cut across people’s partisan identities and policy attitudes. The results show …

  • Heuristics Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2013•Citada por: 88•Referências: 35

    Party cues provide citizens with low‐cost information about their representatives’ policy positions. But what happens when elected officials deviate from the party line? Relying on the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), we examine citizens’ knowledge of their senators’ positions on seven high‐profile roll‐call votes. We find that although politically interested citizens are the group most likely to know their senator's position…

  • Inferences Made Easy

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2016•Citada por: 10•Referências: 42

    This article investigates whether constituents are able to accurately infer their senators’ votes when the senator frequently votes against the party line. We find that when senators repeatedly vote against the party line, constituents’ ability to correctly identify their senators’ votes drops precipitously while levels of misinformation rise. We then show that citizens represented by senators who tend to vote against the party line are also less…

  • The effect of cross-cutting partisan debates on political decision-making

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2017•Citada por: 1•Referências: 22

    Party identification provides citizens with an anchor from which they derive many of their political attitudes and issue preferences. But what happens when people encounter political debates that place their partisan identities and policy attitudes into conflict with one another? This article draws on an original experiment designed to study the effect of debates that cut across people’s partisan identities and policy attitudes. The results show …

  • Partisanship and Perceptions of Party-Line Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2018•Citada por: 5•Referências: 50

    This paper explores public perceptions of congressional partisanship in an era of polarized parties. We use data from a module on the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) that asks respondents about the voting behavior of their legislators. Our results show that individuals underestimate the extent to which legislators from their own party vote the party line—even when primed with information about high levels of party-line voting…

  • Multiple meanings? The link between partisanship and definitions of voter fraud

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Adriano Udani•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2021•Citada por: 11•Referências: 25

  • Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Clifford, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2021•Citada por: 108•Referências: 56

    The use of survey experiments has surged in political science. The most common design is the between-subjects design in which the outcome is only measured posttreatment. This design relies heavily on recruiting a large number of subjects to precisely estimate treatment effects. Alternative designs that involve repeated measurements of the dependent variable promise greater precision, but they are rarely used out of fears that these designs will y…

  • Primary Divisions

    John Henderson, John A Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2022•Citada por: 8•Referências: 33

    While central to theories of polarization and primary elections, surprisingly little evidence shows that partisans favor candidates who take ideologically consistent issue positions, above other considerations, in intraparty contests. In this study, we investigate how voters weigh policy and nonpolicy differences when evaluating same-party politicians, using novel conjoint experiments that manipulate the demographic, biographical, and issue infor…

  • Tolerance for the Free Speech of Outgroup Partisans

    Open Access•R F Carlos, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2023•Referências: 6

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Trade politics at the checkout lane

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert, Rosemary Powers et al.•ARTICLE•Political Science Research and…•2023•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    As international trade flourishes, Americans can choose from an increasing number of foreign products even at their local grocery stores, allowing consumers to directly experience the consequences of globalized trade in a simple and intuitive way that does not require much political expertise. Yet, most prior scholarship on political consumerism assumes that consumers are aware of the political and economic implications of their choices at the ch…

  • A Good Partisan? Ideology, Loyalty, and Public Evaluations of Members of Congress

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Logan Dancey et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023•Citada por: 2•Referências: 22

    In recent years, legislators from both parties have drawn attention for their public support or opposition to leading figures within their party, such as Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi. Yet we know relatively little about the extent to which voters care about members' professed loyalty to party leaders, especially when compared to competing considerations such as members' policy positions. In two national survey experiments, we independently manip…

  • Partisan Poll Watchers and Americans’ Perceptions of Electoral Fairness

    Open Access•Mollie J Cohen, Geoffrey Sheagley•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024•Referências: 47

    Poll watchers play an increasingly visible role in American elections, yet there is little research into how their presence shapes beliefs about electoral integrity. On the one hand, poll watchers—like other election observers—may lead voters to be more trusting in elections. On the other hand, poll watchers who expressly represent political parties may contribute to polarized views of electoral integrity. We address this gap with two conjoint ex…

  • The Personal Vote in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, John Henderson et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2024•Citada por: 4•Referências: 40

    This study offers experimental tests of the “personal vote” in an era of heightened partisanship and polarization. Using three national surveys, we randomly present information about a hypothetical legislator's voting record, committee assignment, and district‐oriented work. After evaluating the legislator, respondents are presented with information about a challenger running on a nationalized message. Respondents, especially out‐partisans, repor…

  • No Evidence that Measuring Moderators Alters Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Clifford•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2025•Citada por: 19•Referências: 66

    Social scientists are frequently interested in who is most responsive to a treatment. By necessity, such moderation experiments often rely on observed moderators, such as partisan identity. These designs have led to an ongoing debate about where to measure moderators—immediately prior to the treatment, after the treatment, or in a prior wave of a panel survey. Measuring a moderator prior to the treatment is the most efficient and avoids posttreat…

Electoral Systems and Political Participation (11 obras) · Political science (11 obras) · Law (10 obras) · Law (10 obras) · Politics (9 obras) · Psychology (9 obras) · Social Psychology (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Social Psychology (5 obras) · Voting (5 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae