Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing Midlevel Band Performance
A Mixed Methods Study
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10200024 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Martin J Bergee (0000-0002-7098-1911, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, autor correspondente), Emily G Rossin (0000-0002-0893-0275, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 214-232 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022429418825144 |
| OpenAlex | W2909570852 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
This study’s purposes were to develop a rating scale for midlevel band performance and validate a theoretical structure for the scale. Research questions were (a) What qualities describe excellent seventh- and eighth-grade band performance? (b) What items constitute a Midlevel Band Performance Rating Scale (MBPRS)? (c) How reliable is the MBPRS? and (d) Does the MBPRS demonstrate construct validity? Mixed methods were employed, in particular the exploratory sequential design, which has a three-phase variant involving the development of an instrument of assessment. During Phase 1, 20 middle school band directors were asked to provide descriptions of excellent band performance at the middle level, of whom 10 responded. Their statements were grouped into categories and translated into 27 items appropriate for a rating scale. During Phase 2, 151 students participating in four different concert band ensembles at three universities used the items to rate one seventh- and one eighth-grade band performance. After item analyses confirmed their suitability, the 27 items became a Midlevel Band Performance Rating Scale. Internal consistency (coefficient alpha) of the 27 items was good for both sets of ratings, .90 for seventh grade and .92 for eighth grade. Phase 3 established construct validity for the two sets of ratings by confirming that their underlying structures were consistent with previous research
Consistency (knowledge bases · Construct (python library · Construct validity · Developmental psychology · Internal consistency · Psychometrics · Rating scale · Scale (ratio · Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Diverse Music Education Insights · Musicians’ Health and Performance · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology
Basics of qualitative research
Summated Rating Scale Construction
Testing Structural Equation Models
Points of Convergence in Music Education
Development and Validation of a Rating Scale for Wind Jazz Improvisation Performance
Effects of Conducting-Gesture Instruction on Seventh-Grade Band Students' Performance Response to Conducting Emblems
A Facet-Factorial Approach to Rating High School Choral Music Performance
Reliability and Perceived Pedagogical Utility of a Weighted Music Performance Assessment Rubric
Performer, Rater, Occasion, and Sequence as Sources of Variability in Music Performance Assessment
An Observational Study of Intermediate Band Students’ Self-Regulated Practice Behaviors
Self-Evaluation Accuracy among High School and Middle School Instrumentalists
The Effect of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Peer-Assisted Learning Structures on Music Achievement and Learner Engagement in Seventh-Grade Band
A Theoretical Structure of High School Concert Band Performance
Instrumentalists' Assessment of Solo Performances with Compact Disc, Piano, or No Accompaniment
The Effect of a Recorded Model on Band Students' Performance Self-Evaluations, Achievement, and Attitude
The Effect of Instrumental Music Participation and Socioeconomic Status on Ohio Fourth-, Sixth-, and Ninth-Grade Proficiency Test Performance
Effect of Melodic Context, Tuning Behaviors, and Experience on the Intonation Accuracy of Wind Players
Naturalistic inquiry
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |