Obedience in Modern Society
The Utrecht Studies
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10219514 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Wim Meeus (0000-0002-5496-3430, Utrecht University, autor correspondente), Wim H J Meeus, Quinten A W Raaijmakers (Utrecht University) |
| Ano | 1995 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 155-175 |
| Data de publicação | 1995-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-4537 • E-ISSN: 1540-4560 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01339.x |
| OpenAlex | W2128031041 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
The Utrecht Studies on Obedience, a series of 19 experiments, demonstrated that obedience is extremely high when the violence to be exerted is a contemporary form of mediated violence, and remains high even when the subjects receive detailed information about the task in advance. Observation of the subjects and analysis of data from questionnaires and the debriefing show that the subject's attitude to the experimenter's commands is critical to very critical, and that they found it unpleasant and stressful to carry out the task. This stress was not, however, sufficient to make the subjects disobedient. They attempted to hide their stress from the victim and to act as if nothing was wrong, displaying the behavior of an official. The explanation for the high level of obedience should not be sought in the inability of the subjects to resist the scientific authority (see the results of the condition of Legal Liability), but in their attitude to social institutions and their distant relationship with fellow citizens. Active role playing offers an attractive opportunity for ethically acceptable obedience research
Debriefing · Epistemology · Liability · Milgram experiment · Nothing · Obedience · Political science · Subject (documents · Task (project management · Historical and Scientific Studies · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology
Arguing, Obeying and Defying
Influence and Leadership
Levels of Analysis in Social Psychology
Social Influence
Destructive Obedience Without Pressure
Authority and Conformity
Modern Institutions, Phenomenal Dissociations, and Destructiveness Toward Humans and the Environment
Arguing, Obeying and Defying
Two for the seesaw
Personality Predicts Obedience in a M ilgram Paradigm
Abortion as a Social Problem
The Milgram-Holocaust Linkage
Torture
Psychological reactions to incidents of political mass killing
Spinning an Organizational “Web of Obligation”? Moral Choice in Stanley Milgram’s “Obedience” Experiments
Les formes d'action sociale réciproque
What Makes a Person a Perpetrator? The Intellectual, Moral, and Methodological Arguments for Revisiting Milgram's Research on the Influence of Authority
Final solutions
A Criminology of Dis/Obedience
Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority "Relationship" Condition
Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram's Electric Shock "Obedience" Experiments
Desobediencia en situaciones extremas
Encounters with unjust authority
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
Obedience to authority
The prediction and perception of obedience to authority1
Determinants of dissent in a psychological experiment
Why did he do it? attribution of obedience and the phenomenon of dispositional bias
Administrative Obedience
Experimental Studies of Personal Pressure and Resistance
Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority
Role play and Deception
Behaviour Analysis treating Subjects as Actors rather than Organisms
Some thoughts on ethics of research
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1969
Social control in the psychological experiment
Role playing
Involvement in role-playing simulations
Level of destructive obedience as a function of transmitter and executant roles in the Milgram obedience paradigm
Ubiquitous Watergate
Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment
Human use of human subjects
Will hypnotized persons try to harm themselves or others
Behavioral Study of obedience
Conformity under Deceptive and Non-Deceptive Techniques
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,81 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1999 - 2023 (25) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 21 |