Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority "Relationship" Condition
Some Methodological and Theoretical Implications
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5937053 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nestar Russell (0000-0001-9150-1684, Nipissing University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 194-214 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-04-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci3020194 |
| OpenAlex | W2148947740 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
In May 1962, social psychologist, Stanley Milgram, ran what was arguably the most controversial variation of his Obedience to Authority (OTA) experiments: the Relationship Condition (RC). In the RC, participants were required to bring a friend, with one becoming the teacher and the other the learner. The learners were covertly informed that the experiment was actually exploring whether their friend would obey an experimenter's orders to hurt them. Learners were quickly trained in how to react to the impending "shocks". Only 15 percent of teachers completed the RC. In an article published in 1965, Milgram discussed most of the variations on his baseline experiment, but only named the RC in passing, promising a more detailed account in his forthcoming book. However, his 1974 book failed to mention the RC and it remained unpublished until François Rochat and Andre Modigliani discovered it in Milgram's personal archive in 1997 at Yale University. Their overview of the RC's procedure and results left a number of questions unanswered. For example, what were the etiological origins of the RC? Why did Milgram decide against publishing this experiment? And does the RC have any significant methodological or theoretical implications on the Obedience studies discourse? Based on documents obtained from Milgram's personal archive, the aim of this article is to shed new light on these questions
Epistemology · Milgram experiment · Obedience · Psychoanalysis · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Arguing, Obeying and Defying
Developing psychology’s archival sensibilities
Introduction to the special issue
The normalization of torment
Arguing, Obeying and Defying
Years of “Obedience to Authority”
From “Ridiculous” to “Glad to Have Helped”
Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram's Electric Shock "Obedience" Experiments
Behind the Shock Machine
A new outline of social psychology.
Obedience to authority
Issues in the study of obedience
Making the Undoable Doable
Spinning an Organizational “Web of Obligation”? Moral Choice in Stanley Milgram’s “Obedience” Experiments
The Case that Milgram Makes
Constructive and Destructive Obedience
Obedience in Retrospect
Perspectives on Obedience to Authority
The Emergence of Milgram's Bureaucratic Machine
Obedience in Modern Society
Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority
Instead of Deception
Some thoughts on ethics of research
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment
Stanley Milgram and the Obedience Experiment
The Sociology of Justice
Behavioral Study of obedience
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,73 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |