Sexual Consent and Lying About One’s Self
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10347104 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jennifer Matey (0000-0001-9145-1891, Southern Methodist University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 380-400 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-11-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phpr.12659 |
| OpenAlex | W2988489784 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 18 |
Despite the acknowledgement of the moral significance of consent there is still much work to be done in determining which specific sexual encounters count as unproblematically consensual. This paper focuses on the impact of deception. It takes up the specific case of deception about one’s self. It may seem obvious that one ought not to lie to a sexual partner about who one is, but determining which features of oneself are most relevant, as well as the lies which it follows would be impermissible to tell, is complicated. It is argued here that deception about one’s morally valenced character traits, those we think of as virtues and vices, are particularly problematic. This is true regardless of whether knowing the truth about those traits would have made a difference to one’s partner’s consent. Attention is then drawn to a range of types of lies that one ought not to tell
Acknowledgement · Character (mathematics · Deception · Epistemology · Lying · Self-deception · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |