Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

La percepción del proceso político por parte de los ciudadanos. Una evaluación crítica de la consistencia de las preferencias y las preguntas de encuesta

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10440830
AutoresÅsa Bengtsson (Åbo Akademi University, autor correspondente)
Ano2012
Volume70
FascículoExtra_2
Páginas45-64
Data de publicação2012-12-30
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRevista Internacional de Sociología (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0034-9712 • E-ISSN: 1988-429X
EditoraSpanish National Research Council (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3989/ris.2012.01.29
OpenAlexW636315996
IdiomaES
Citações recebidas31
Referências citadas22

El estado actual de las investigaciones no nos dice mucho sobre las expectativas de los ciudadanos con respecto a la toma de decisiones políticas. La mayoría de las encuestas permiten que quienes las responden evalúen cómo funciona el sistema actual, pero no preguntan por procedimientos alternativos de decisión política. La falta de preguntas de encuesta contrastadas se puede explicar tanto por el hecho de que los cambios en los procedimientos de toma de decisiones han resultado difíciles de prever, como por el escepticismo general con respecto a la capacidad de las personas para formarse una opinión sobre estos asuntos. Los procesos políticos son, sin duda, asuntos complejos que no se prestan bien a preguntas simplistas de encuesta. Además, los estudios previos han demostrado convincentemente que la mayoría de la gente tiene dificultades en general para adoptar una actitud única, estable y coherente que tenga que ver con asuntos políticos incluso mucho más directos. Para determinar si el hecho de intentar captar las actitudes hacia la toma de decisiones políticas en futuros estudios empíricos es una empresa fructífera, este estudio pretende valorar críticamente hasta qué punto la gente expresa preferencias coherentes sobre estos asuntos, y si esas preferencias están en consonancia con lo que se esperaba en las dispersas investigaciones previas. Este estudio se basa en la Encuesta Electoral Finlandesa de 2011, un estudio que, a diferencia de la mayoría de los estudios electorales, incluye una rica variedad de preguntas de encuestas sobre este tema y utiliza una combinación de estrategias para buscar algún patrón en la opinión de los ciudadanos

Consistency (knowledge bases · Perception · Political science · Politics · Preference · Statistics · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Policy Transfer and Learning · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • De l’opinion publique aux conceptions démocratiques

    Jessy Bailly•Annuaire international de justice…•2021

  • Une représentation sous contrôle

    Camille Bedock, Loïc Bonin et al.•Participations•2021

  • Citizens' Contrasting Aspirations About Their Political System

    Open Access•Camille Bedock•Frontiers in Political Science•2020

  • Young Rebels Who Do Not Want a Revolution

    Open Access•Janette Huttunen•Frontiers in Political Science•2021

  • Stealth democracy, elitism, and citizenship in Finnish energy policy

    Open Access•Ilkka Ruostetsaari•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • How citizens evaluate the legitimacy of direct vote and representation-based decision-making

    Open Access•Zuzana Scott, Lucie Lomičová et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2023

  • Do Affective Polarization and Populism Affect the Support for Holding Referendums

    Open Access•Marco Fölsch•Politics and Governance•2024

  • Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making

    Open Access•Reinhard Heinisch, Carsten Wegscheider•Politics and Governance•2020

  • Control or participate? The Yellow Vests’ democratic aspirations through mixed methods analysis

    Open Access•Stéphanie Abrial, C Alexandre et al.•French Politics•2022

  • Knowing and distrusting

    Open Access•Henrik Serup Christensen•European Societies•2017

  • Surmonter un effet Guttman et classer des données d’enquête. Une alliance des analyses factorielles et des classes latentes

    Open Access•Camille Bedock, Paul Le Derff•Bulletin of Sociological…•2025

  • Control or influence? Conflict or solidarity? Understanding diversity in preferences for public participation in social policy decision making

    Open Access•Rikki Dean•Social Policy and Administration•2019

  • Youth support for direct versus talk‐centric democratic processes in Finland

    Open Access•Janette Huttunen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2024

  • What drives process preferences? The role of perceived qualities of policymakers and party preferences

    Open Access•José Luis Fernández-Martínez, Pau Alarcón et al.•Acta Politica•2022

  • The personality of stealth democrats

    Maya Ackermann, Kathrin Ackermann et al.•West European Politics•2019

  • Explaining Support for Stealth Democracy

    Stephen K Medvic, Stephen Medvic•Representation•2019

  • Changing Democracy? Why Inertia is Winning Over Innovation

    Lidia Nunez, Caroline Close et al.•Representation•2016

  • The devil is in the detail

    Open Access•José Luis Fernández-Martínez, Joan Font Fàbregas et al.•Politics•2018

  • Public Support for Expert Decision-Making

    Open Access•Lauri Rapeli•Politics•2016

  • An Alternative to Representation

    Open Access•Gherghina, Brigitte Geissel•Political Studies Review•2019

  • Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation

    Open Access•Gherghina, Sergiu Gherghina et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Participation, Representation and Expertise

    Open Access•Joan Font, Magdalena Wojcieszak et al.•Political Studies•2015

  • Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) About Democratic Preferences

    Open Access•Steven Goldberg, Dominik Wy et al.•Political Studies•2020

  • What Citizens Want in Terms of Intra-Party Democracy

    Open Access•Caroline Close, Camille Kelbel et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Ideals and Actions

    Open Access•Åsa Bengtsson, Henrik Serup Christensen et al.•Government and Opposition•2016

  • Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens

    Open Access•Camille Bedock, Jean-Benoit Pilet•Government and Opposition•2021

  • Personal or Impersonal Evaluations? Political Sophistication and Citizen Conceptions of the Democratic Process

    Open Access•Lauri Rapeli, Åsa Von Schoultz•Government and Opposition•2023

  • Citizens’ preferences for liberal democracy and its deformations

    Open Access•Pascal D König•European Political Science Review•2022

  • Weak agency and preferences for participatory democracy

    Patricia García-Espín•Democratization•2022

  • Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizens’ Preferences for Democracy

    Open Access•Pascal D König, Markus B Siewert et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Participatory Skepticism

    Open Access•Patricia García-Espín, Ernesto Ganuza•Qualitative Sociology•2017

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices

    Russell J Dalton•DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES, DEMOCRATIC…•2004

  • Critical Citizens

    Pippa Norris•Critical citizens•1999

  • Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research

    Open Access•Timothy R Levine, Craig R Hullett•Human Communication Research•2002

  • The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Philip E Converse•Politisk Psykologi•2010

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Henry C Kenski, John R Zaller et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1993

  • Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response

    Open Access•Christopher H Achen•American Political Science Review•1975

  • A Simple Theory of the Survey Response

    John Zaller, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses

    Dean Lacy•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Direct Democracy and its Critics

    Åsa Bengtsson, Mikko Mattila•West European Politics•2009

  • Types of Political Attitude Structure

    John A Fleishman•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  • Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens’ Ambivalence about Gay Rights

    Open Access•Stephen C Craig, Michael D Martinez et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Popular Support for Direct Democracy

    Open Access•Todd Donovan, Jeffrey A Karp•Party Politics•2006

  • Public Opinion and Direct Democracy

    Open Access•Russell J Dalton, Wilhelm Bürklin et al.•Journal of democracy•2001

  • The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence toward Presidential Candidates

    Howard Lavine•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy

    R Michael Alvarez, John Brehm•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda

    Open Access•Cameron D Anderson, Cameron Anderson et al.•Electoral Studies•2010

  • Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

Obras citantes distintas31
Citações por ano2,82
Intervalo de citações2015 - 2025 (11)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 31
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae