Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6266192
AutoresCamille Bedock (0000-0003-1393-8439, Centre Émile Durkheim, autor correspondente), Jean-Benoit Pilet (0000-0001-5612-0835, Université Libre de Bruxelles)
Ano2021
Volume56
Fascículo3
Páginas485-504
Data de publicação2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGovernment and Opposition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/gov.2020.1
OpenAlexW3015092083
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas52
Referências citadas54

Despite their multiplication over the last 15 years, studies on the support for assemblies composed of citizens selected by lot are rare and the few that exist analyse citizens’ attitudes towards such mini-publics as consultative bodies associated with traditional representative institutions. In this article, we examine support for citizens selected by lot as new policymakers who take the most important political decisions instead of political representatives. We contrast support for this radical democratic innovation with support for two other reforms that increase citizen participation: generic support for a greater involvement of citizens in policymaking, and specific support for citizen-initiated referendums. The goal is to understand whether the drivers of support for citizens selected by lot overlap or differ from the drivers of support for other forms of citizen participation. We rely upon data from the 2017 French Election Study

Democracy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public support · Publics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Who supports multilingual deliberative mini-publics? A relational perspective from Luxembourg

    Lisa Verhasselt, Emilien Paulis

  • Les représentations de la démocratie à ­­l’épreuve des espaces métropolitains

    Adrien ­­Bidaud-­­Bonod, Stéphane Cadiou et al.•Participations•2024

  • When Experts Speak Louder

    Open Access•Jane Suiter, Eileen Culloty et al.•Environmental Communication•2026

  • Why Populism Wins? Collective Political Agency and the Limits of Deliberative Mini-Publics

    Open Access•Yanina Welp•Representation•2026

  • Is sortition the ideal? Examining public reactions to climate assemblies

    Open Access•Anthony Kevins, J Robison•Political Psychology•2026

  • Citizens' Contrasting Aspirations About Their Political System

    Open Access•Camille Bedock•Frontiers in Political Science•2020

  • Why Voting Does Not Imply Consenting

    Open Access•Laetitia Ramelet•Frontiers in Political Science•2020

  • Do Citizens Perceive Elected Politicians, Experts and Citizens as Alternative or Complementary Policy-Makers? A Study of Belgian Citizens

    Open Access•Jean-Benoit Pilet, David Talukder et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2020

  • Agencification, policy reversal and the reforms of the French health care system

    Open Access•Daniel Simonet•Public Administration and Policy•2023

  • The role of political engagement of parents in reducing the gender gap in political self-efficacy

    Elina Kestilä-Kekkonen, Josefina Sipinen et al.•European Journal of Politics and…•2023

  • The Preferred Governing Actors of Populist Supporters

    Open Access•Jean-Benoit Pilet, Davide Vittori et al.•Politics and Governance•2024

  • Limited Congruence

    Open Access•Gherghina, Brigitte Geissel et al.•Politics and Governance•2024

  • Control or participate? The Yellow Vests’ democratic aspirations through mixed methods analysis

    Open Access•Stéphanie Abrial, C Alexandre et al.•French Politics•2022

  • Beyond parliamentarism

    Open Access•Davide Vittori, Sebastien Rojon et al.•Comparative European Politics•2024

  • Politics outside parliament

    Open Access•Gherghina, Raluca Farcas•Comparative European Politics•2025

  • Climate change assemblies as spaces for the potential mitigation of climate policy misperceptions

    Open Access•Jane Suiter, Kevin Saude et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Thriving on poor soil? People’s attitudes towards deliberation in transition countries

    Open Access•Gherghina, Paul Tap•Contemporary Politics•2026

  • Who wants to be in the Driver’s seat? Members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations

    Open Access•Claudiu Marian, Gherghina•Party Politics•2026

  • Populism and democratic attitudes

    Open Access•João Gaio E Silva, Marco Lisi•Party Politics•2024

  • Public support for deliberative democracy. A specific look at the attitudes of citizens from disadvantaged groups

    Open Access•David Talukder, Jean-Benoit Pilet•Innovation The European Journal…•2021

  • Do the origins of climate assemblies shape public reactions? Examining the impact of partisanship

    Open Access•Anthony Kevins, J Robison•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • The perceived problem‐solving potential of deliberative minipublics

    Open Access•Lisa Van Dijk, Heinz Werner et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Do Voters Trust Deliberative Minipublics? Examining the Origins and Impact of Legitimacy Perceptions for the Citizens’ Initiative Review

    Open Access•Kristinn Már, John Gastil•Political Behavior•2021

  • Resistor or Meta-Governor? Role Conceptions of Local Elected Representatives in Participatory Trajectories

    Open Access•Nina De Smedt, Willem Goutry et al.•Administration & Society•2025

  • Institutional Design Preferences Among German and US Citizens

    Open Access•Claudia Landwehr, Catalina Ojeda et al.•Political Studies•2025

  • Trends in Mini-Publics Research

    Open Access•Yanina Welp•International Political Science…•2024

  • More competent thus more legitimate? MPs’ discourses on deliberative mini-publics

    Open Access•Sacha Rangoni, Camille Bedock et al.•Acta Politica•2023

  • Can democratic innovations reconcile citizens with representative institutions

    Open Access•Pierre‐étienne Vandamme•Acta Politica•2024

  • Enraged, Engaged, or Both? A Study of the Determinants of Support for Consultative vs. Binding Mini-Publics

    Camille Bedock, Jean-Benoit Pilet•Representation•2023

  • How Experience Increases the Legitimacy of Citizen Deliberation

    Open Access•Eric Kramon•Political Behavior•2026

  • The Perception of the Legitimacy of Citizens’ Assemblies in Deeply Divided Places? Evidence of Public and Elite Opinion from Consociational Northern Ireland

    Open Access•John Garry, James Pow et al.•Government and Opposition•2022

  • How can we agree on democratic procedures? Dimensions of conflict in the political process space

    Open Access•Claudia Landwehr•Journal of International…•2025

  • Conflicts of Legitimacies in Representative Institutions

    Éric Buge, Pierre‐étienne Vandamme•Representation•2023

  • Scaling Up? Unpacking the Effect of Deliberative Mini-Publics on Legitimacy Perceptions

    Open Access•Micha Germann, Sofie Marien et al.•Political Studies•2024

  • Pushing and Pulling

    Open Access•T W G Tom Van Der Meer, Lisa Janssen•Political Behavior•2025

  • Analysing policy actors’ preferences for different modes of governing in local government

    Bram Verschuere, Arne Roets et al.•Policy & Politics•2025

  • The Polarization of Legislative Party Votes

    Open Access•Flemming Juul Christiansen•Parliamentary Affairs•2021

  • Empowering the people

    Open Access•Sofia Serra‐silva, João Gaio E Silva•Parliamentary Affairs•2025

  • Sortition, its advocates and its critics

    Open Access•Vincent Jacquet, Christoph Niessen et al.•International Political Science…•2022

  • Back to the Westminster model? The Brexit process and the UK political system

    Open Access•Gianfranco Baldini, Edoardo Bressanelli et al.•International Political Science…•2022

  • How can we accept ‘our’ decisions

    Open Access•Akito Yamaguchi, Masaki Hata et al.•Japanese Journal of Political…•2024

  • The perceived legitimacy of deliberative minipublics

    Open Access•Lisa Van Dijk, Emma Turkenburg et al.•European Political Science Review•2023

  • Public support for deliberative citizens' assemblies selected through sortition

    Open Access•Jean-Benoit Pilet, Jean‐benoît Pilet et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Distrusting democrats

    Open Access•Ebe Ouattara, Tom Van Der Meer et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Closing a gap or creating a new one? Comparing support for participatory instruments among different stakeholders

    Open Access•Bram Wauters, Tessa Haesevoets et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Weak agency and preferences for participatory democracy

    Patricia García-Espín•Democratization•2022

  • Are Democratic Innovations Legitimate to the Broader Public? Evidence from Survey Experiments in Ghana

    Open Access•Eric Kramon•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Support for Deliberative mini-Publics among the Losers of Representative Democracy

    Open Access•Jean-Benoit Pilet, Camille Bedock et al.•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • Bring the Public In

    Open Access•Giada Gianola•Swiss Political Science Review•2025

  • Cue-taking, populist attitudes, and support for holding a referendum

    Open Access•Marco Fölsch, Martin Dolezal et al.•Contemporary Politics•2024

  • Why Do Politicians Not Act Upon Citizens’ Deliberations? Evidence From Iceland

    Open Access•Valgerður Björk Pálsdóttir, Gherghina et al.•Political Studies Review•2025

  • Empowered Minipublics for Democratic Renewal? Evidence from Three Conjoint Experiments in the United States, Ireland, and Finland

    Open Access•Steven Goldberg, Marina Lindell et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Reforming Democracy

    Camille Bedock•Reforming Democracy•2017

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • The Principles of Representative Government

    Open Access•Bernard Manin•Principles of Representative…•1997

  • Evaluating Democratic Innovations

    Kenneth Newton, Brigitte Geissel•Evaluating Democratic Innovations•2012

  • Democratic Innovations

    Open Access•Graham Smith•Democratic Innovations•2009

  • Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices

    Russell J Dalton•DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES, DEMOCRATIC…•2004

  • When Citizens Decide

    Patrick Fournier, Henk Van Der Kolk et al.•When citizens decide•2011

  • The Participation Gap

    Russell J Dalton•Participation Gap•2017

  • Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies

    Russell J Dalton•Critical citizens•1999

  • Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior

    Open Access•Stephen C Craig•American Politics Quarterly•1979

  • Critical Citizens

    Pippa Norris•Critical citizens•1999

  • Participatory Democracy and Political Participation

    Thomas Zittel, Dieter Fuchs•Participatory Democracy and…•2006

  • The Civic Culture Transformed

    Open Access•Marita R Inglehart, Paul R Abramson et al.•Civic Culture Transformed•2014

  • Democracy for Realists

    Christopher H Achen, Larry M Bartels•Democracy for Realists•2016

  • Democratic Deficit

    Open Access•P Norris•Democratic Deficit•2011

  • The Politics of Resentment

    Katherine J Cramer•Politics of Resentment•2015

  • La socialisation politique sexuée

    L Bargel•Nouvelles Questions Féministes•2005

  • A Survey Experiment on Citizens’ Preferences for ‘Vote–Centric’ vs. ‘Talk–Centric’ Democratic Innovations with Advisory vs. Binding Outcomes

    Open Access•Sebastien Rojon, Arieke J Rijken et al.•Politics and Governance•2019

  • The 2017 French Election Study (FES 2017)

    Open Access•Florent Gougou, Nicolas Sauger•French Politics•2017

  • Un président normal’? Presidential (in-)action and unpopularity in the wake of the great recession

    Open Access•Emiliano Grossman, Nicolas Sauger•French Politics•2014

  • Conceptions of democracy, political representation and socio-economic well-being

    Open Access•Camille Bedock, Sophie Panel•French Politics•2017

  • Winning, Losing, and the Dynamics of External Political Efficacy

    Nicholas T Davis, Matthew P Hitt•International Journal of Public…•2016

  • La percepción del proceso político por parte de los ciudadanos. Una evaluación crítica de la consistencia de las preferencias y las preguntas de encuesta

    Open Access•Åsa Bengtsson•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2012

  • Public support for referendums in Europe

    Open Access•Andreas R T Schuck, Andreas Schuck et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Technocratic attitudes

    Eri Bertsou, Giulia Pastorella•West European Politics•2017

  • Direct Democracy and its Critics

    Åsa Bengtsson, Mikko Mattila•West European Politics•2009

  • An Alternative to Representation

    Open Access•Gherghina, Brigitte Geissel•Political Studies Review•2019

  • Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation

    Open Access•Gherghina, Sergiu Gherghina et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Participation, Representation and Expertise

    Open Access•Joan Font, Magdalena Wojcieszak et al.•Political Studies•2015

  • Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) About Democratic Preferences

    Open Access•Steven Goldberg, Dominik Wy et al.•Political Studies•2020

  • Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The mobilization of political discontent

    Open Access•Stephen C Craig•Political Behavior•1980

  • When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly

    Open Access•Jane Suiter, David M Farrell et al.•International Political Science…•2016

  • Ideals and Actions

    Open Access•Åsa Bengtsson, Henrik Serup Christensen et al.•Government and Opposition•2016

  • Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Paul Webb, Paul D Webb•European Journal of Political…•2013

  • Do the Rich and the Poor Have Different Conceptions of Democracy? Socioeconomic Status, Inequality, and the Political Status Quo

    Besir Ceka, Pedro C Magalhães•Comparative Politics•2020

  • Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy

    Steven E Finkel•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • The Limits of Political Efficacy

    Open Access•Joseph Kahne, Joel Westheimer•PS Political Science & Politics•2006

  • Knowing and Caring about Politics

    Sidney Verba, Nancy Burns et al.•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Karp, Susan Banducci et al.•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda

    Open Access•Cameron D Anderson, Cameron Anderson et al.•Electoral Studies•2010

  • Le tirage au sort est-il compatible avec l'élection

    Pierre-Étienne Vandamme, Pierre‐étienne Vandamme•Revue française de science…•2018

  • Participatory Skepticism

    Open Access•Patricia García-Espín, Ernesto Ganuza•Qualitative Sociology•2017

  • Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy

    Open Access•H Coffe, Agnes Michels•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Ciudadanía, políticos y expertos en la toma de decisiones políticas la percepción de las cualidades de los actores políticos importan

    Open Access•Adrián Del Río, Clemente J Navarro et al.•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • Democracy for Realists

    Michael E Levin, Michael Levin•The European Legacy•2018

  • Beyond SES

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Sidney Verba et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Intercameral Relations in a Bicameral Elected and Sortition Legislature

    Open Access•Pierre-Étienne Vandamme, Pierre‐étienne Vandamme et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

Obras citantes distintas52
Citações por ano8,67
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 51
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae