Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Service users' experiences and views of support for decision‐making

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12289857
AutoresPaul Webb (0000-0002-4118-8973, Praxis (United Kingdom), autor correspondente), Paul D Webb (0000-0003-3458-000X, Praxis Care Belfast UK), Gavin Davidson (0000-0001-6003-0170, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK), Rosalie Edge (Mencap NI Belfast UK), David Falls (Praxis Care Belfast UK), Fionnuala Keenan (Praxis Care Belfast UK), Berni Kelly (0000-0002-4204-6694, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK), Aisling McLaughlin (0000-0002-1561-0894, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK), Lorna Montgomery (0000-0003-0377-3773, Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK), Christine Mulvenna (Mencap NI Belfast UK), Barbara Norris (Mencap NI Belfast UK), Aine Owens (Mencap NI Belfast UK), Rebecca Shea Irvine (Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK)
Ano2020
Volume28
Fascículo4
Páginas1282-1291
Data de publicação2020-02-23
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hsc.12961
PMID32090392
OpenAlexW3006449421
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas17

This article presents the findings from a qualitative, participatory research project which explored how people with intellectual disabilities and/or mental health problems have, or have not been, supported to make their own decisions. The aim of the research is to help inform how supported decision-making, as required by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, can be effectively operationalised. The project provides an overview of experiences of support as well as identifying which supports are valued. It was conducted between July 2017 and July 2018 and was a partnership between disabled people, service providers and a University. It involved peer researchers interviewing 41 people with mental health problems and/or intellectual disabilities, in community settings, about their experiences and views of support. The key findings include that decision-making is a central aspect of people's lives. Participants discussed the positive role which decision-making can have but also how it felt when they were not supported to make their own decisions. Participants said that there were three main things that make decision-making harder: the type of decision; the role of other people; and what the outcome might be. Time was consistently identified as a very important factor. In terms of support, people said that they would like: practical support including more accessible information; emotional support including someone to talk to; and sometimes the options to choose from. There was very little mention of existing, more formal processes of support such as advance decisions or care planning. The peer researcher aspect of the project was valued by participants. The main implications of the research are for how support for decision-making should be provided including the need for an individualised approach as the support needed varies across decisions, time and people

Business · Convention · Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities · General partnership · Interview · Medical education · Mental health · Participatory action research · Peer support · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Service (business · Service provider · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology

  • Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability

    Open Access•Paul Webb, Gavin Davidson et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2020

  • Best Interests decision-making processes in learning disability services in Northern Ireland

    Open Access•Danielle McIlroy, Lorna Montgomery et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2026

  • In the centre or caught in the middle? – Social workers’ and healthcare professionals’ views on user involvement in Coordinated Individual Plans in Sweden

    Open Access•David Matscheck, Katarina Piuva•Health & Social Care in the…•2021

  • Towards a ‘Social Model’ of Mental Capacity for Social Work

    Open Access•Clare Brown•The British Journal of Social Work•2024

  • Participatory Research

    Dirk Schubotz•Participatory Research•2020

  • Supported Decision-Making from Theory to Practice

    Open Access•Rosie Harding, Ezgi Taşcıoğlu•Societies•2018

  • Legislating personhood

    Open Access•Eilionóir Flynn, Anna Arstein-Kerslake•International Journal of Law in…•2014

  • Estranged relations

    Open Access•Meredith Stone, Renata Kokanović et al.•Medical Humanities•2019

  • A social approach to decision-making capacity

    Shari Mcdaid, Sarah Delaney•Disability & Society•2011

  • Supported Decision-Making

    Open Access•Fauzia Knight, Renata Kokanović et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2018

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,67
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae