Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Disagreement and mitigation in power-asymmetrical venture capital reality TV shows

A comparative case study of Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12859872
AutoresHuiyu Zhang (0000-0002-1354-1581, Zhejiang University), Zhao Jun-xiang (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Yicheng Wu (0000-0003-2284-0417, Zhejiang University, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume18
Fascículo2
Páginas245-276
Data de publicação2021-03-13
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoIntercultural Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1612-295X • E-ISSN: 1613-365X
EditoraDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ip-2021-2004
OpenAlexW3135914956
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas59

This paper examines the relationships among cultural variation, power, disagreement, and mitigation devices. Based on a multi-modal analysis of original data from two TV shows ( Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China), it is found that investors’ linguistic performance shows greater frequency and variation in both disagreement and its mitigation, influenced by power and politeness. Regarding the role of cultural variation, this study challenges some stereotypical conceptions of culture with the finding that Chinese participants use negation more often than their US counterparts. Meanwhile, Chinese and American participants choose different disagreement-mitigation formats: In the US Shark Tank investors tend to initiate disagreements by enforcing explicitness and entrepreneurs tend to mitigate them by offering explanations, while in the Chinese Dragon’s Den investors tend to utter negations and then mitigate them with qualifiers or alternative statements. Moreover, the American show also contains cases where the pre-set power-asymmetrical relationship changes during the course of presentation, and entrepreneurs with increasing power start to challenge investors by asking them various questions. However, this alteration of power relationships appears to be more difficult in the Chinese context

Business · Capital (architecture · China · Context (archaeology · Linguistics · Negation · Politeness · Political science · Power (physics · Set (abstract data type · Variation (astronomy · Computer Science · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Marketing

  • Who is our friend and who is our enemy? The enregisterment of tribalising digital discourse during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Zhu Hua, Li Wei•Applied Linguistics Review•2025

  • Exploiting language affordances in Chinese-mediated intercultural communication

    Xi Chen, Weihua Zhu•Intercultural Pragmatics•2023

  • Intercultural communication

    Ronald Scollon, Suzanne B K Scollon et al.•Intercultural communication•1995

  • Gesture and Thought

    Dougal Mcneill, David Mcneill•Gesture and Thought•2005

  • Gender and Politeness

    Open Access•Sara Mills•Gender and Politeness•2003

  • Impoliteness

    Open Access•Jonathan Culpeper•Impoliteness•2011

  • Politeness Phenomena in England And Greece

    Maria Sifianou•Politeness phenomena in England…•1992

  • The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity

    Roger Brown, Roger S Brown et al.•Readings in the Sociology of…•1968

  • Interaction Ritual

    Erving Goffman, Joel Best•Interaction Ritual•2017

  • Expressing Disagreement in ELF Business Negotiations

    Anne Kari Bjørge•Applied Linguistics•2012

  • Power and Politeness in Action

    Michael A Locher, Miriam A Locher•Power and politeness in action•2004

  • Laughing when nothing’s funny

    Open Access•Shawn Warner‐garcia, Shawn Warner-Garcia•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2015

  • Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research

    Open Access•John W Du Bois•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora

    Jo Angouri, Theodora Tseliga•Journal of Politeness Research•2010

  • Politeness and in-directness across cultures

    Eva Ogiermann•Journal of Politeness Research•2009

  • Expressing disagreement in English as a lingua franca

    Carmen Maíz-Arévalo•Intercultural Pragmatics•2014

  • American and Chinese complaints

    Yuan-Shan Chen, Chun-Yin Doris Chen et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2011

  • Internal e-mail communication in the workplace

    Annelise Ly•Intercultural Pragmatics•2016

  • A cross-linguistic study of metacommunication in online hotel reviews

    Irene Cenni, Patrick Goethals et al.•Intercultural Pragmatics•2020

  • Politeness in power-asymmetrical e-mail requests of Korean and American corporate employees

    Sun Hee Kim, Hikyoung Lee•Intercultural Pragmatics•2017

  • The conflict‐positive organization

    Open Access•Dean Tjosvold•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2007

  • Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness

    Open Access•David C Cansler, William B Stiles•Journal of Experimental Social…•1981

  • Culture and concepts of power

    Carlos J Torelli, Sharon Shavitt•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • Language structure in social interaction

    T Holtgraves•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Penelope Brown, C Levinson et al.•Politeness•1987

  • Beyond the micro-level in politeness research

    Marina Terkourafi•Journal of Politeness Research•2005

  • Theorising disagreement

    Open Access•Jo Angouri, Michael A Locher et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Conversational mitigation

    Open Access•Bruce Fraser•Journal of Pragmatics•1980

  • Disagreement patterns in gifted classes

    Hadar Netz•Journal of Pragmatics•2014

  • Desirable and undesirable disagreements

    Open Access•Esty Teomim Ben-Menachem, Zohar Livnat•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Managing relationships in everyday practice

    Weihua Zhu•Journal of Pragmatics•2014

  • Power, severity, and context in disagreement

    Open Access•Janie Rees-Miller, Janie Rees‐miller•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Disagreeing without a 'no

    Open Access•Renia Lopez-Ozieblo•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Chinese requests

    Open Access•Rong Chen, Lin He et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Universals of linguistic politeness

    Open Access•Beverly Hill, Sachiko Ide et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•1986

  • Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk

    Open Access•Jo Angouri•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Arguing about the future

    Open Access•A Georgakopoulou•Journal of Pragmatics•2001

  • Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts

    Open Access•A Wierzbicka•Journal of Pragmatics•1985

  • Indirectness and politeness in Turkish-German bilingual and Turkish monolingual requests

    Open Access•Leyla Marti, Leyla Martı•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

  • Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions

    Open Access•Wei-Lin Melody Chang, Michael Haugh•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • Honorifics, "politeness," and power in Japanese political debate

    Open Access•Janet S Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S Shibamoto‐smith•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • Disagreements, face and politeness

    Open Access•Maria Sifianou•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Against rationalistic pragmatics

    Open Access•Roman Kopytko•Journal of Pragmatics•1995

  • Reexamination of the universality of face

    Open Access•Y Matsumoto•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese

    Open Access•Yueguo Gu•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • Agonism in academic discourse

    Open Access•Deborah Tannen•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Jewish argument as sociability

    Open Access•Deborah Schiffrin•Language in Society•1984

  • Yes, but

    Open Access•T Holtgraves•Journal of Language and Social…•1997

  • Unequal Relationships in High and Low Power Distance Societies

    Open Access•Helen Spencer-Oatey•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1997

  • The Dynamics of Face Loss Following Interpersonal Harm for Chinese and Americans

    Open Access•Yuan Liao, Yuan Liao Yuan Liao et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2011

  • Social-Cognitive and Situational Influences on the Use of Face-Saving Persuasive Strategies

    Open Access•Greg Leichty, James L Applegate•Human Communication Research•1991

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,67
Intervalo de citações2023 - 2025 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae