Mapping the Responsibilities to Protect

A Typology of International Duties

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12960656
AutoresJames Pattison (0000-0002-6938-2321, University of Manchester, autor correspondente)
Ano2015
Volume7
Fascículo2
Páginas190-210
Data de publicação2015-09-10
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
EditoraBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-00702006
OpenAlexW1639256607
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas4

The international responsibility to protect is the most important and value-added element of the responsibility to protect (R2P) doctrine. However, the existing accounts of the international responsibilities of R2P are often fairly ad hoc and not clearly systematised, largely focusing on particular responsibilities. Consequently, this article provides a typology of the various international responsibilities required by the R2P. In particular, it presents six types of international responsibility to protect: (1) the responsibility to undertake direct action; (2) the responsibility to support direct action; (3) the responsibility to authorise; (4) the responsibility not to act; (5) the responsibility to advance R2P; and (6) the responsibility to reform. In doing so, it will clarify how these responsibilities hang together and highlight underappreciated responsibilities

Action (physics · Business · Collective responsibility · Doctrine · International Action · International law · Law and economics · Moral responsibility · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Typology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security