The Responsibility to Protect
Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4445244 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Aidan Hehir (0000-0002-4153-5170, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 218-239 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0047-1178 • E-ISSN: 1741-2862 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0047117809366205 |
| OpenAlex | W2033238728 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 33 |
The term 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) has dominated debate on humanitarian intervention since the publication in 2001 of the report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). Today 'R2P' has become a seemingly obligatory reference point for all researchers in this field and R2P's near ubiquity is testament to the effective marketing of the idea. This article will argue, however, that the currency of the term obscures its hollowness. R2P has undeniably changed the discourse surrounding humanitarian intervention, and possibly broadened interest in the subject, but it has contributed little of substance or prescriptive merit. Though the report was drafted with the mandate to reconcile international human rights with state sovereignty it fudged the key issues, namely, substantive reform of the United Nations Security Council, the legitimacy of unilateral humanitarian intervention and the threshold for intervention. The shift in focus from response to prevention since 2001 evades the key issue which prompted the ICISS to draft its report and fails to provide a viable or innovative approach
Commission · Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · International law · Intervention (counseling) · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Mandate · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Sovereignty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Medicine · Peacebuilding and International Security · Public Administration
El aprendizaje institucional ruso y las operaciones regionales de paz
The Responsibility to Protect at Ten
R2p – From Fanfare to Obscurity
Mapping the Responsibilities to Protect
Sexuality, Gender, and the Colonial Violence of Humanitarian Intervention
Cyber-Intervention Unit Against Genocide
Is Securitisation a Natural and Useful Response to Existential Threats? Introducing the Idea of Peacification
The humanisation of security? Towards an International Human Protection Regime
The responsibility to protect
The Responsibility to Protect Debate
Intervention in the Emerging Multipolar System
Conceptualizing multicultural discourses of security
Intervention in Libya
Redefining Humanitarian Intervention
Systemic evil and the international political imagination
Introduction
What prospects for common humanity in a divided world? The scope for RtoP in a transitional international order
The responsibility to protect – An incoherent doctrine
Mediating among Mediators
The Uses of Sovereignty in Twenty-first Century Russian Foreign Policy
The Responsibility to Protect Turns Ten
Defining Down Sovereignty
Changing ideas, changing norms
Does R2P matter? Interpreting the impact of a norm
Unbowed, unbent, unbroken? Examining the validity of the responsibility to protect
The Responsibility to Protect
Humanitarian intervention (HI) and the responsibility to protect (R2P)
The Permanence of Inconsistency
When Duty Calls
Russian Strategic Narratives on R2P in the ‘Near Abroad’
Humanitarian Intervention and Burden-Sharing Justice
The Responsibility to Protect in a world of already existing intervention
Human security and the separation of security and development
| Obras citantes distintas | 33 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 29 |