Costs and Benefits
A Review of Research on Take-up of Income-Related Benefits
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 14564653 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Peter Craig (0000-0002-7653-5832, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1991 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 537-565 |
| Data de publicação | 1991-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047279400019796 |
| OpenAlex | W2022865203 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 47 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
This paper reviews recent research on take-up with a view to identifying the most promising lines of further enquiry. In the late 1970s take-up research seemed to be foundering in the face of the complexity of the factors affecting claiming decisions. Progress came via the development of models of the claiming process. The most influential postulated a series of thresholds which claimants must pass in a set sequence on the way to claiming a benefit. One question for future research is whether this model is still the best starting point or whether there are others which capture the key factors and their interaction more fully and accurately. Another approach is to look at claiming decisions indirectly by applying multivariate techniques to continuous survey data to examine the relationship between variables such as age, income and housing tenure and differing probabilities of claiming. A second question is what the two approaches can offer each other. Overhanging all the issues facing take-up research is the problem of sampling a population—eligible non-recipients—for which, almost by definition, no suitable sampling frame exists. The paper concludes by examining various options for identifying this elusive group
Actuarial science · Economics · Face (sociological concept) · Frame (networking) · Key (lock) · Multivariate statistics · Point (geometry) · Population · Positive economics · Process (computing) · Public economics · Sampling (signal processing) · Sampling frame · Set (abstract data type) · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets · Mathematics · Organic Food and Agriculture
Why do eligible individuals fail to enrol for social assistance programmes? A systematic narrative review of factors affecting take-up
Long‐term ill‐health, poverty and ethnicity
Social benefits in Uruguay
Estimating and Testing a Model of Welfare Participation
Labor Market Discrimination and Sorting
The Take Up of Social Benefits
Transfers in Cash and In-Kind
Targeting welfare
European Social Citizenship
Targeting welfare
Modelling the take-up of state support
The flight from universalism
Take-Up Down Under
The Do-Well study
The reach of disability benefits
Clan culture and private insurance take-up
From formal rights to real opportunities
Diversity, inequality and official data
Psychological barriers to take-up of healthcare and child support benefits in the Netherlands
Underclaiming and Overclaiming
Earned income credit utilization by welfare recipients
The impact of welfare advice in primary care
Long-term health conditions and Disability Living Allowance
Trotz Anspruch keine Leistung
Public Health Insurance, Program Take-Up, and Child Health
Welfare Dependency and Welfare Underuse
Welfare Dependency and Welfare Underuse
Realizing Rights in Social Work
A disarmingly simple idea? Practical bottlenecks in the implementation of a universal basic income
The Changing Financial Circumstances of Households with Children
Managing Appeals
Pride in economic psychology
Can welfare-rights advice targeted at older people reduce social exclusion
Charity or Entitlement? Generational Habitus and the Welfare State among Older People in North‐east England
Do‐It‐Yourself Social Policy
Social security or insecurity? The experience of welfare participation by financially vulnerable households in the Netherlands
Non‐take up of the supplemental child benefit for children with a disability in Belgium
Means-Tested welfare policies and the quiet fear of poverty amongst older people
Randomised studies of income supplementation
What Other Programs Can Teach Us
Generalisation and Phronesis
Response 1
Are New Right Policies Sustainable? 'Back to Basics' and Public Choice
Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona's B-Mincome Experiment
Take-up and the Social Fund
The stigma of claiming benefits
Support for everyone or selection of some? Self-selection and assignment into a large-scale refugee mentoring program in Germany
Poverty and Social Security
Non-Take-Up of Social Security Benefits in Europe
Household Claiming Behaviour
Expert Systems and the Public Provision of Welfare Benefit Advice
The Employment Lottery
Deciding about Supplementary Pensions
Temporal Aspects of Claiming Behaviour
Rent Benefits and Tenants' Attitudes. The Batley Rent Rebate and Allowance Study
| Obras citantes distintas | 47 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,42 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1993 - 2026 (34) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 43 |