Declining hunter and trapper mail survey response rates between 1976 and 2020 in illinois

We examined mail survey response rates between 1976 and 2020. All 129 studies analyzed: (a) were conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey, (b) sampled the same population (Illinois hunters/trappers), (c) followed identical administration protocols, and (d) had the same structure. The unit of analysis was study year. Across all surveys, the average response rate was 67% (SD=.13) and ranged from a high of 86% (1982) to a low of 36% (2018). Among the waterfowl hunters, response rates ranged from 83% (1981) to 36% (2018). The comparable ranges for upland game hunters were 86% (1982) to 41% (2020), and for trappers the range was 85% (1989) to 50% (2020). The bivariate correlation between study year and response rate was −.95 for waterfowl surveys, −.86 for upland game surveys, and −.84 for trapper surveys. Results highlighted dramatic declines in response rates for all three activities over time

Geography · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

• How Biased is Your ‘Catch’? Adjusting for Avidity-Related Non-Response Bias in Recreational Surveys

  Mahesha K Kuluppuarachchi, Jeremy T Bruskotter et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2026

  Incluir item

• Does Sending a Printed Survey as the Final Reminder Boost Response Rate? A Mixed Mode Approach

  Lydia Horne, Alyssa R Soucy et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2026

  Incluir item

• Survey type, respondent age and response rates among hunters and trappers in Illinois

  Jerry J Vaske, Brent D Williams et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  Incluir item

• Survey Research and Societal Change

  Roger Tourangeau•Annual Review of Psychology•2004

  Incluir item

• Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires

  Open Access•Phil Edwards, Ian Roberts et al.•BMJ•2002

  Incluir item

• Understanding the Diversity of Public Interests in Wildlife Conservation

  Open Access•Tara L Teel, Michael J Manfredo•Conservation Biology•2010

  Incluir item

• Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

  Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  Incluir item

• A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys

  Open Access•Colleen Cook, Fred Heath et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2000

  Incluir item

• Evaluating alternative survey methodologies in human dimensions of wildlife research

  Jerry J Vaske, Andrew W Don Carlos et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2022

  Incluir item

• The Fallacy of Online Surveys

  Mark Duda, Mark Damian Duda et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2010

  Incluir item

• The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys

  Richard C Stedman, Nancy A Connelly et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  Incluir item

• Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys

  Nancy A Connelly, Tommy L Brown et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2003

  Incluir item

• Response to mail surveys on resource‐based recreation topics

  Tommy L Brown, Daniel J Decker et al.•Leisure Sciences•1989

  Incluir item

• The Practice of Social Research

  Kristen Wenzel, Earl Babbie et al.•Teaching Sociology•1994

  Incluir item

• Understanding the resilience of mail-back survey methods

  Open Access•Bryan D Rookey, Lena Le et al.•Social Science Research•2012

  Incluir item

• How Social Processes Distort Measurement

  Katharine G Abraham, Sara Helm et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2009

  Incluir item

• Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires

  Thomas A Heberlein, R Baumgartner•American Sociological Review•1978

  Incluir item

• Can A Deadline and Compressed Mailing Schedule Improve Mail Response in the Decennial Census

  Elizabeth Martins, Elizabeth Martin•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  Incluir item

• The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias

  Robert M Groves, Emilia Peytcheva•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  Incluir item

• Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

  Robert M Groves•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  Incluir item

• Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century

  Richard T Curtin, R Curtin et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  Incluir item

• An Alternative to the Response Rate for Measuring a Survey's Realization of the Target Population

  Benjamin Skalland•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  Incluir item

• Research Synthesis

  R Baker, Stephen J Blumberg et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  Incluir item

• Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples

  David S Yeager, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  Incluir item

• Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India

  Open Access•T C Boas, D P Christenson et al.•Political Science Research and…•2020

  Incluir item

• Household Surveys in Crisis

  Open Access•Bruce D Meyer, Bruce Meyer et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2015

  Incluir item

• Method Bias Mechanisms and Procedural Remedies

  Open Access•Minghui Yao, Yunjie Xu•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

  Incluir item