Evaluating alternative survey methodologies in human dimensions of wildlife research

Surveys are frequently used in human dimensions of wildlife research. Declines in response rates from mail and telephone surveys, however, have led researchers to seek alternatives (e.g., online platforms). This article evaluated effects of both selection and response biases on estimates of demographics, wildlife-related recreation, and wildlife value orientations across mail, telephone, and online panel surveys. Selection bias revealed that the mail survey overestimated males and older respondents. By design, the online panel yielded demographic estimates proportional to the population. All methods underestimated non-participants in hunting/fishing. Response bias via acquiescence (i.e., agreement on all items) was evident in the telephone survey, which showed higher population estimates of Pluralists, defined as people emphasizing both mutualism and domination orientations. Findings showed data weighting is necessary to address selection concerns in all three methods. Combined mail/online panel approaches are recommended for measuring wildlife value orientations and similar concepts to avoid possible response bias

Biology · Business · Demographics · Geography · Population · Recreation · Selection (genetic algorithm · Selection bias · Sociology · Statistics · Wildlife · Computer Science · Demography · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Mathematics · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology · Marketing

• Beyond message framing

  Open Access•Jessica Frater, Mike Daniels et al.•People and Nature•2025

  Incluir item

• Actively encouraging online responses to a mixed-mode mail and web survey

  Len M Hunt•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2023

  Incluir item

• Survey type, respondent age and response rates among hunters and trappers in Illinois

  Jerry J Vaske, Brent D Williams et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  Incluir item

• Declining hunter and trapper mail survey response rates between 1976 and 2020 in illinois

  Jerry J Vaske, Craig A Miller et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2024

  Incluir item

• Does Sending a Printed Survey as the Final Reminder Boost Response Rate? A Mixed Mode Approach

  Lydia Horne, Alyssa R Soucy et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2026

  Incluir item

• Survey Research and Societal Change

  Roger Tourangeau•Annual Review of Psychology•2004

  Incluir item

• Understanding the Diversity of Public Interests in Wildlife Conservation

  Open Access•Tara L Teel, Michael J Manfredo•Conservation Biology•2010

  Incluir item

• The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

  Lynn Vavreck, Douglas Rivers•Journal of Elections Public…•2008

  Incluir item

• Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

  Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  Incluir item

• Wildlife value orientations

  David C Fulton, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•1996

  Incluir item

• Can Weighting Compensate for Sampling Issues in Internet Surveys

  Jerry J Vaske, Maarten Jacobs et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2011

  Incluir item

• The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys

  Richard C Stedman, Nancy A Connelly et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  Incluir item

• Linking Society and Environment

  Open Access•Michael J Manfredo, Tara L Teel et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2009

  Incluir item

• The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias

  Robert M Groves, Emilia Peytcheva•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  Incluir item

• Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

  Robert M Groves•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  Incluir item

• Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century

  Richard T Curtin, R Curtin et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  Incluir item

• Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires

  Allyson L Holbrook, Melanie C Green et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2003

  Incluir item

• Research Synthesis

  R Baker, Stephen J Blumberg et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  Incluir item

• Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples

  David S Yeager, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  Incluir item

• Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

  Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  Incluir item

• Survey Research

  Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  Incluir item

• Household Surveys in Crisis

  Open Access•Bruce D Meyer, Bruce Meyer et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2015

  Incluir item

• Method Bias Mechanisms and Procedural Remedies

  Open Access•Minghui Yao, Yunjie Xu•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

  Incluir item

• Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys

  Barry Schouten, Jan Van Den Brakel et al.•Social Science Research•2013

  Incluir item