Attitudes, Knowledge, and Worry About HIV in the U=U Era
A Campaign with Before-After Surveys Among HIV-Negative Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sweden
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15338478 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carl Fredrik Sjöland (0000-0003-3594-8849, Public Health Agency of Sweden, autor correspondente), Nicklas Dennermalm (0000-0002-3148-2909, Stockholm University), Lena Nilsson Schönnesson (Karolinska Institutet), Karin Laine, Erica Kanon (White arkitekter (Sweden)), Daniel Suárez (0000-0003-3417-1169), AM Ekstrom (Karolinska Institutet), Muslima Ejaz (0000-0002-1187-9095) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 1699-1712 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-02-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | AIDS and Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1090-7165 • E-ISSN: 1573-3254 |
| Editora | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10461-025-04972-9 |
| PMID | 41712054 |
| OpenAlex | W7130511476 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
Despite evidence that undetectable equals untransmittable (U=U), negative attitudes toward people living with HIV persist among men who have sex with men (MSM). We examined HIV-related knowledge, attitudes and relationship willingness among Swedish MSM and evaluated an anti-stigma campaign. Repeated cross-sectional online surveys of MSM aged ≥ 18 years were conducted in Sweden (2020-2021) before and after an anti-stigma campaign. Participants were recruited via LGBTQIA+ media and dating or cruising platforms. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic and behavioral factors. We analyzed 3100 pooled responses and 1132 post-campaign responses. Knowledge gaps were substantial: 72% had not encountered U=U messaging and only 53% knew that treatment prevents transmission. Nearly half expressed unwillingness to consider relationships with people living with HIV. Negative attitudes decreased with higher knowledge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.53) and increased with greater worry (aOR 3.66; CI 2.75-4.90). Greater relationship willingness was associated with higher HIV knowledge (aOR 3.79; CI 2.67-5.41). Less negative attitudes and greater relationship willingness were also linked to openness about sexual orientation. Campaign exposure was significantly associated with higher knowledge, less negative attitudes, lower worry, and greater relationship willingness. U=U awareness remains limited and stigma persists. The interrelations between knowledge, worry, and attitudes highlight cognitive and emotional dimensions of stigma. Observed links with campaign exposure suggest potential value of concise, context-specific U=U-centered communication in addressing stigma among MSM
Confidence interval · Health psychology · Logistic regression · Men who have sex with men · Odds ratio · Openness to experience · Public health · Worry · HIV Research and Treatment · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework
From Conceptualizing to Measuring HIV Stigma
Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER)
Stigma reduction interventions in people living with HIV to improve health-related quality of life
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Public Knowledge and Attitudes to HIV
Transactional Sex
The need to know
If U equals U what does the second U mean?’
Meta-analysis and systematic review of studies on the effectiveness of HIV stigma reduction programs
Stress-Related Growth, Coming Out, and Internalized Homonegativity in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth. An Examination of Stress-Related Growth Within the Minority Stress Model
Growing up in the shadow of HIV
A Dual-Process Model of Reactions to Perceived Stigma
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |