Interventions to reduce the prescription of inappropriate medicines in older patients
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 16780396 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nathalia Serafim dos Santos (0000-0003-1024-2313, Universidade de Sorocaba), Lívia Luize Marengo (0000-0001-5069-6075, Universidade de Sorocaba), Francisco Dos Santos Moraes (0000-0002-1432-196X, Universidade de Sorocaba), Silvio Barberato-Filho (0000-0001-5179-3125, Universidade de Sorocaba) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Páginas | 7 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-01-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Revista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910 |
| Editora | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053000781 |
| PMID | 30726488 |
| OpenAlex | W2909928837 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 1 |
OBJECTIVE: Identify and critically evaluate systematic reviews addressing the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients. METHODS: This is an overview of systematic reviews. The studies were searched and selected from Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science databases, combining the terms aged, prescriptions, inappropriate prescribing and potentially inappropriate medication list with their entry terms and other related descriptors, published by June 2017. This study included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that addressed the effectiveness of any intervention or combined interventions to reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications to older patients, without restriction in terms of design, language or date of publication of primary studies. AMSTAR – A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews – was used to evaluate the methodological quality of selected systematic reviews. Study selection and the methodological quality evaluation were performed by two independent evaluators, who resolved any divergence by consensus. The main findings were grouped into thematic categories, defined after a content analysis and discussed qualitatively as narrative synthesis. RESULTS: This study analyzed 24 systematic reviews. In terms of study design and methodological quality evaluation, most were systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials and studies of moderate quality, respectively. The interventions were analyzed in five thematic categories: medication review services, pharmaceutical interventions, computerized systems, educational interventions, and others. The interventions analyzed showed good results and most of them helped reduce the number of prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic reviews included in this overview showed potential benefits of different interventions. However, it was not possible to determine the most effective intervention. Combined interventions are likely to provide better results than isolated interventions
Alternative medicine · CINAHL · Cochrane Library · Family medicine · Medical prescription · MEDLINE · Pathology · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Randomized controlled trial · Systematic review · Thematic analysis · Frailty in Older Adults · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine · Nursing · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Surgery
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |