How to Talk to a Science Denier
Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20006798 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lee Mcintyre (0000-0003-0607-8151, autor correspondente), Lee C Mcintyre |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Páginas | 264 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-08-17 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Periódico | How to Talk to a Science Denier (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editora | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7551/mitpress/13918.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4244417662 |
| Open Library | OL34138453M |
| ISBN | 9780262366724 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
Can we change the minds of science deniers? Encounters with flat earthers, anti-vaxxers, coronavirus truthers, and others. “Climate change is a hoax—and so is coronavirus.” “Vaccines are bad for you.” These days, many of our fellow citizens reject scientific expertise and prefer ideology to facts. They are not merely uninformed—they are misinformed. They cite cherry-picked evidence, rely on fake experts, and believe conspiracy theories. How can we convince such people otherwise? How can we get them to change their minds and accept the facts when they don't believe in facts? In this book, Lee McIntyre shows that anyone can fight back against science deniers, and argues that it's important to do so. Science denial can kill. Drawing on his own experience—including a visit to a Flat Earth convention—as well as academic research, McIntyre outlines the common themes of science denialism, present in misinformation campaigns ranging from tobacco companies' denial in the 1950s that smoking causes lung cancer to today's anti-vaxxers. He describes attempts to use his persuasive powers as a philosopher to convert Flat Earthers; surprising discussions with coal miners; and conversations with a scientist friend about genetically modified organisms in food. McIntyre offers tools and techniques for communicating the truth and values of science, emphasizing that the most important way to reach science deniers is to talk to them calmly and respectfully—to put ourselves out there, and meet them face to face
Aesthetics · Denial · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Fake news · Hoax · Media studies · Misinformation · Paranormal · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Science communication · Science education · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Pseudoscience · Public opinion · Reasoning · Science · Social aspects · Truthfulness and falsehood
Science Denial
Science Studies, public understanding of science, and the long shadow of teleology
Beyond the Thinking/Feeling Binary
Effectiveness of training actions aimed at improving critical thinking in the face of mis- and disinformation
Posverdad y ontopolítica en el movimiento antigénero
When belief becomes research
Demarcation that Makes the Layperson Smart
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition
Post-Enquiry and Disagreement. A Socio-Epistemological Model of the Normative Significance of Disagreement Between Scientists and Denialists
Rethinking Metaphors
From Folklore to Conspiracy Beliefs
Anti-Intellectualism?” Situating Javier Milei’s Discourse About Science
Making Sense of Science Denialism
Science and the Public
Public Engagement with Science
Pseudo-scientific versus anti-scientific online conspiracism
Nihilistic Distrust
You know Birds Aren’t Real isn’t real, right?” Working Through Communication and Media Studies Student Affect in the Critical Communication Classroom
Dilemmes moraux et politiques pendant la pandémie de coronavirus
Public Health, Science, and the Public’s Trust
Disputed expertise and chaotic disinformation
Motivated ignorance and social identity threat
Science as Social Knowledge
Denialism
Science as Social Knowledge
Anti-vaxxers how to challenge a misinformed movement
Motivated Rejection of Science
Dark Money
Science as Social Knowledge
Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
Ideologues without Issues
The Affective Tipping Point
When Corrections Fail
Countering science denial
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 5,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 22 |