Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Pseudo-scientific versus anti-scientific online conspiracism

A comparison of the Flat Earth Society’s Internet forum and Reddit

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6443370
AutoresFederico Pilati (0000-0001-5526-1011, University of Bologna, autor correspondente), T Venturini (0000-0003-0004-5308, University of Geneva), P L Sacco (0000-0002-5559-2889, University of Chieti-Pescara), Floriana Gargiulo (0000-0001-9813-1815, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Ano2024
Volume27
Fascículo9
Páginas5324-5341
Data de publicação2024-05-14
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoNew Media & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14614448241252593
OpenAlexW4396898580
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas33

Attitudes of distrust and paranoia toward scientific and political institutions are increasingly identified as major troubles in online communication and often lumped together under the umbrella term of conspiracy theories. However, this term encompasses two distinct communication practices that deserve to be distinguished. Traditional conspiratorial thinking adopts pseudo-scientific arguments, while newer manifestations lack coherent theories, promoting trolling, and antagonism. We argue that these strands align with different types of digital communications and are supported by different technical infrastructure and cultures of use, with classic conspiracy theories prevalent in early online venues and “conspiracies-without-theory” more common on social media. By comparing the Flat Earth Society’s Internet forum and its subreddit, we highlight their stark differences. The forum prioritizes pseudo-scientific discourse, while the subreddit fosters confrontational antagonism and unmoderated escalation. Recognizing these distinctions is vital for understanding their communicative profoundly different nature and developing targeted strategies to address them effectively

Confusion · Distrust · Epistemology · Internet privacy · Media studies · Paranoia · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Science communication · Scientific communication · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Dabloons, autopsy of a TikTok meme

    Open Access•Francisco W Kerche, T Venturini•Convergence The International…•2026

  • Mapping discursive regimes of transnational dynamics of conspiracy theories as an emergent process

    Open Access•Zeyu Hu•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • Post-Truth

    Fuller, Steve Fuller•Post-Truth•2018

  • Participatory Culture, Community, and Play

    Adrienne L Massanari, Adrienne Massanari•Participatory Culture, Community,…•2015

  • Orality and Literacy

    Walter J Ong•Oralität und Literalität•1982

  • Deep state phobia

    Open Access•Marc Tuters, Tom Willaert•Convergence The International…•2022

  • Memecry

    Open Access•Sal Hagen, T Venturini•Information Communication & Society•2024

  • Contesting epistemic authority

    Open Access•J Harambam, Stef Aupers•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • How to Talk to a Science Denier

    Lee Mcintyre, Lee C Mcintyre•How to Talk to a Science Denier•2021

  • A Lot of People Are Saying

    Nancy L Rosenblum, Russell Muirhead•A Lot of People Are Saying•2019

  • American Conspiracy Theories

    Joseph E Uscinski, Joseph M Parent•American conspiracy theories•2014

  • Dead and Alive

    Open Access•Michael J Wood, Karen M Douglas et al.•Social Psychological and…•2012

  • On Bullshit

    Harry G Frankfurt•On Bullshit•2005

  • From the Fringe to the Fore

    Open Access•Peter L Forberg•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2022

  • Tracing normiefication

    Open Access•Daniel De Zeeuw, Sal Hagen et al.•First Monday•2020

  • Constructing alternative facts

    Open Access•Arthur Marwick, William Clyde Partin•New Media & Society•2022

  • Some Dare Call It Conspiracy

    Open Access•Michael J Wood•Political Psychology•2016

  • Speaking Truth to Conspiracy

    Russell Muirhead, Nancy L Rosenblum•Critical Review•2016

  • Do Your Own Research

    Clare Birchall, Peter Knight et al.•Social research•2022

  • On the Fringe

    Steven Gimbel•History Reviews of New Books•2022

  • Digital Methods for Ethnography

    Open Access•Alessandro Caliandro•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2018

  • Online Conspiracy Theories, Digital Platforms and Secondary Orality

    Open Access•T Venturini•Theory Culture & Society•2022

  • Panic, pizza and mainstreaming the alt-right

    Open Access•Paul Bleakley•Current Sociology•2023

  • Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda

    Open Access•John A Banas, Gregory Miller et al.•Human Communication Research•2013

  • The Consequences of Literacy

    Open Access•Jack Goody, Ian Watts et al.•Comparative Studies in Society…•1963

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano2
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae