Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

“What on Earth Is Smenkhkare?” WH‐Questions, Truth‐Makers, and Causal‐Informational Account of Reference

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20141965
AutoresJani Sinokki (0000-0003-1554-2630, Research Unit for History, Culture and Communications University of Oulu, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume88
Fascículo2
Páginas326-347
Data de publicação2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoTheoria (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12360
OpenAlexW3208663847
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas15

Although the historical‐causal picture of reference Kripke sketches in Naming and Necessity is highly influential, Kripke in fact says very little about what reference is and how it comes about. In this paper I point out that the possibility of asking WH‐questions (i.e. ‘what?’, ‘who?’, ‘which?’) about a sound or inscription pattern (e.g., what does that refer to?) shows that in case of names especially, their reference, if there is one, will be preserved by a causal‐historical chain constituted by transmissions of the (physical) patterns themselves, even in absence of language users or any linguistic intentions. I sketch out a causal‐informational theory of reference, that holds that the causal aspect of refence transmission is due to two‐factors. On the other hand there are informational chains constituted by data transmissions, on the other, also communicational rules by which speakers can interpret the data as information of something are needed. In most part the causal‐informational theory sketched in the paper can be viewed as complementing Kripke’s original causal picture. However, I will argue that Kripke's account of fixing the reference of proper names in ‘initial baptisms’ is inadequate. I will argue that most cases of seemingly fixing the reference via use of a definite description (e.g., the naming of Neptune) in fact presuppose a prior causal‐informational connection to the named object, thus essentially fixing the reference in the same way as in cases of baptism by ostension. I will further argue that in the cases that do not fall into the previous category, the baptism by definite description simply fail to fix any reference. I thus conclude that there is no such thing as fixing the reference of a proper name by definite description

Algorithm · Baptism · Causal theory of reference · Causality (physics) · Epistemology · Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Proper noun · Sketch · Computer Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The Philosophy of Information

    Luciano Floridi•The philosophy of information•2011

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference

    Open Access•Saul A Kripke, Saul Kripke et al.•Midwest Studies in Philosophy•1977

  • Ii.—on Denoting

    Bertrand Russell•Mind•1905

  • Minds, brains, and programs

    Open Access•John R Searle•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1980

  • Frege

    Robert Buhr, Robert D Buhr et al.•Language•1983

  • Modalities and intensional languages

    Open Access•Ruth Barcan Marcus•Synthese•1961

  • Knowledge and the Flow of Information

    William P Alston, Fred I Dretske et al.•The Philosophical Review•1983

  • Reference and Definite Descriptions

    Keith S Donnellan•The Philosophical Review•1966

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae