OKness Revised
Analysis and Evolution of Berne’s Concept of OKness, the Basic Positions, and the Related Reenactments of Berne’s Internal World in the Transactional Analysis Community
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20178841 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ales Zivkovic (0000-0001-6446-0813, Private practice, London, United Kingdom, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 286-300 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Transactional Analysis Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0362-1537 • E-ISSN: 2329-5244 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03621537.2023.2214420 |
| OpenAlex | W4382396311 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
Ever since Eric Berne conceptualized basic positions, the concept of OKness has almost incomprehensibly changed. Considering each individual as inherently OK, the so-called moral OKness that today is one of the cornerstone principles of transactional analysis (TA), has little in common with Berne’s initial psychodynamic conceptualization. Adding to the confusion, yet another form, what could be referred to as social OKness, emerged. It has become a standard of interpersonal relating within the TA community and has since been institutionalized as one of the formal standards in the TA qualification process. This article revises Berne’s original basic positions and analyzes the related theory. Parallels with Fairbairn’s object relations theory are made. The author touches on potential causes for the theoretical vagueness of the concept of OKness. He questions Berne’s motivation and approach to some of his theory development, which appears to have been substantially influenced by Berne’s internal conflicts. The author argues that conflicts stimulated through Berne’s relationship with psychoanalysis added to his obsession with the development of TA—a theory that would derive its superiority from its differentiation from psychoanalysis and, as such, help Berne mediate his own sense of OKness. Berne’s internal conflicts have since been reenacted within the TA community. A substantial part of post-Bernean theory development reflects Berne’s tendencies toward oversimplification of what are innately complex concepts. This threatens TA’s wider recognition as epistemologically grounded theory, which can also be seen as a reenactment of Berne’s lack of recognition from the psychoanalytic community
Conceptualization · Epistemology · Object relations theory · Parallels · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Sociology · Transactional analysis · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Transactional analysis in psychotherapy
The OK Corral
Therapeutic Relatedness in Transactional Analysis
To Be or Not to Be Ok
Berne's Life Positions
What Do You Say If You Don't Say “Unconscious”
A Lost Connection
What Do We Mean by I'm OK, You're OK
Transactional Analysis and Psychoanalysis
Some Reflections on Simple OKness
Transactional Analysis as a Humanistic Therapy
The OK Position
If Berne Met Winnicott
Developmental Trauma and the Bad Object
The Use of Interpretive Dynamic Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy (Idtap) in Facilitating Structural Integration When Working With Reenactments of Developmental Trauma in the Psychotherapeutic Setting
Victims of Groupthink
The Repression and the Return of Bad Objects (With Special Reference to the ‘War Neuroses’)
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |