Budgets vs individual needs

Purpose Previous research has argued that little is known about the dynamics of (de)coupling. This has led to a relatively static and potentially oversimplified view on how externally imposed accountability demands are incorporated into organizational routines. The purpose of this paper is to address these calls by exploring the dynamic processes of de- and re-coupling the two institutional rules of achieving a “balanced budget” and serving “the needs of individuals” in a Swedish school context. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study based on 28 observations and 32 interviews with principals, administrators and teachers within a large Swedish municipality has been used. Findings In contrast to earlier research, the paper shows that (de)coupling is more than just a static state; it is a result of dynamic challenges and boundary maintenance. It is a state where professional groups try to both decouple and couple accounting into routines to achieve greater autonomy and control, where incarnation of one myth leads to loosening another. It is embedded in an institutional environment’s powerful actors, and when incarnation takes place at different organizational levels, it leads to less conflict in another sphere. The dynamics of (de)coupling thereby unfolds how institutional rules play out in an organizational setting. Practical implications From a practical viewpoint, this paper has provided insights into how rules operate in an organizational setting. Given that regulative authorities tend to assume that rules should be tightly coupled to practice, this paper provides a critical examination of the assumption that coupled organizations are inherently “better” than non-coupled ones. To what extent does incarnation of rules reflect the societal ideas – and for whom? By unfolding the dynamics of (de)coupling, this paper illuminates some potential issues with increased tightness between rules and routines. Originality/value The paper illuminates the ways in which institutional rules takes place on the ground, and the associated roles for accounting in such process

Accountability · Autonomy · Business · Incarnation · Knowledge management · Loose coupling · Organizational structure · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Law · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Policy and Administration Research

• How accounting continues

  Roland Almqvist, Niklas Wällstedt•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2025

  Incluir item

• Conceptualizing management accounting change

  Open Access•John Burns, John Thomas Burns et al.•Management Accounting Research•2000

  Incluir item

• An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’

  Open Access•Stan Brignall, Sven Modell•Management Accounting Research•2000

  Incluir item

• Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics

  Open Access•Trish Reay, C R Hinings•Organization Studies•2009

  Incluir item

• The NPM Agenda

  Open Access•Irvine Lapsley•Financial Accountability and…•2008

  Incluir item

• Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes

  Christine Oliver•Academy of Management Review•1991

  Incluir item

• Privatisation of public education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden

  Inger Erixon Arreman, Ann-Sofie Holm et al.•Journal of Education Policy•2011

  Incluir item

• New Public Management in Public Education

  Open Access•Maria Jarl, Anders Fredriksson et al.•Public Administration•2011

  Incluir item

• Management by Contract’

  Open Access•Roland Almqvist•Public Administration•2001

  Incluir item

• A Public Management for All Seasons

  Open Access•Christopher Hood•Public Administration•1991

  Incluir item

• The Iron Cage Revisited

  P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  Incluir item

• The Myth Incarnate

  Open Access•Tim Hallett•American Sociological Review•2010

  Incluir item

• Institutionalized Organizations

  J W Meyer, Brian Rowan•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  Incluir item