Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Evoking vigilance

Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20403274
AutoresFriederike Hendriks (0000-0003-1023-8103, University of Münster, autor correspondente), Dorothe Kienhues (0000-0002-8250-627X, University of Münster), Rainer Bromme (0000-0002-6123-7269, University of Münster)
Ano2016
Volume25
Fascículo8
Páginas992-1008
Data de publicação2016-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0963662516646048
PMID27150266
OpenAlexW2346614487
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas19
Referências citadas42

The experimental studies presented here investigated whether discussing ethical implications of preliminary scientific results in a science blog would impact blog readers’ perception of the responsible scientist blogger’s epistemic trustworthiness (on the dimensions expertise, integrity, and benevolence). They also investigated whether it made a difference in who had brought forward the ethics aspects: the responsible scientist blogger or another expert. Results indicate that by the mere introduction of ethics, people infer something about the blogger’s communicative intentions: Introducing ethical aspects seems to raise vigilance about an expert’s benevolence and integrity. Moreover, ratings of epistemic trustworthiness differed depending on who added ethical arguments: If ethics were introduced by the scientist blogger himself, his benevolence and integrity were rated higher than when ethics were introduced by another expert. These results are relevant for science bloggers, science communicators, and researchers who study laypeople’s understanding of epistemic uncertainty within science

Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Research ethics · Research integrity · Sociology · Trustworthiness · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Storifying instructional videos on online credibility evaluation

    Open Access•Riikka Anttonen, Kristian Kiili et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Examining the structure of credibility evaluation when sixth graders read online texts

    Open Access•Carita Kiili, Eija Räikkönen et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2023

  • A New Obligation or a Natural Extension? STEM Scientists’ Science Communication in the Context of Their Professional Role Identities

    Open Access•Lennart Banse, Friederike Hendriks et al.•Science Communication•2025

  • The Public Trust in Science Scale

    Open Access•Anne Reif, Monika Taddicken et al.•Science Communication•2024

  • Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes

    Open Access•Angela Bearth, Gülbanu Kaptan et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2022

  • Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople’s trust in researchers and research

    Open Access•Friederike Hendriks, Dorothe Kienhues et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • Scientific uncertainty in media content

    Open Access•Robert J Griffin•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Mediating trust in content about science

    Open Access•Justin T Schröder, Lars Guenther•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Attacking science on social media

    Open Access•Lukas Gierth, Rainer Bromme•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • Scientific uncertainty in media content

    Open Access•Hans P Peters, Sharon Dunwoody•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries

    Open Access•Mark Jonas, Martin Kerwer et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2024

  • The problems of increasing transparency on uncertainty

    Open Access•Magda Osman, Amanda J Heath et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science

    Open Access•Chelsea L Ratcliff, Rebekah Wicke•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Believing in science

    Open Access•Emily Tippins, Renate Ysseldyk et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger

    Open Access•Friederike Hendriks, Dorothe Kienhues et al.•Studies in Communication Sciences•2016

  • Understanding scientific tentativeness through bat ecology

    Open Access•Julia Cathérine Thomas, Katharina Düsing et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2026

  • Face Masks Might Protect You From Covid-19

    Open Access•I Janssen, Friederike Hendriks et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2021

  • Bridging the Divide

    Open Access•Gökçe Zeybek Kabakci, Umut Yener Kara et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Open Science and the Science-Society Relationship

    Open Access•Martin Lakomý, Renata Hlavová et al.•Society•2019

  • Trusting What You're Told

    Paul L Harris•Trusting What You're Told•2012

  • Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science

    Gale M Sinatra, Dorothe Kienhues et al.•Educational Psychologist•2014

  • Public Communication of Science in Blogs

    Open Access•María José Luzón•Written Communication•2013

  • Trust in News Media

    Open Access•Matthias Kohring, Jörg Matthes•Communication Research•2007

  • The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science

    Rainer Bromme, Susan R Goldman•Educational Psychologist•2014

  • Measuring the perceived uncertainty of scientific evidence and its relationship to engagement with science

    Open Access•Joachim Retzbach, Lukas Otto et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online

    Open Access•Miriam J Metzger, Andrew J Flanagin et al.•Journal of Communication•2010

  • Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility

    Miriam J Metzger, Andrew J Flanagin•Digital Media, Youth, and…•2007

  • The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies

    Andrew A Anderson, Ashley A Anderson et al.•International Journal of Public…•2011

  • The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion

    William J Mcguire•Sociometry•1961

  • Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research

    Open Access•Jakob D Jensen•Human Communication Research•2008

  • Medialization of Research Policy

    Open Access•Andreas M Scheu, Anna-Maria Volpers et al.•Science Communication•2014

  • Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change

    Alice H Eagly, Wendy Wood et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • "The "Nasty Effect

    Open Access•Andrew A Anderson, Dominique Brossard et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • Making Science

    Stephan Fuch, Stephan Fuchs et al.•Social Forces•1994

Obras citantes distintas19
Citações por ano1,9
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2026 (11)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 19
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae