Exploring undergraduate EFL students’ growth in knowledge of elements in argumentation and their writing performance
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21196728 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tingting Zhang (0000-0001-9478-9564, University of Auckland), Long Jiang Zhang (0000-0003-1025-1746, University of Auckland, autor correspondente), Gregory Ward (0000-0002-2030-2298, University of Auckland) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1907-1951 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-09-25 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Applied Linguistics Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1868-6303 • E-ISSN: 1868-6311 |
| Editora | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/applirev-2023-0047 |
| OpenAlex | W4407769353 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 64 |
Many specialists in the field of second/foreign language (L2) writing have acknowledged the importance of students’ abilities of argumentation in academic contexts. However, empirical studies of L2 students’ ability in argumentative writing with a systematic framework are still rare. To address this research gap, we adopted a quasi-experimental design of an eight-week writing intervention with a treatment group and a control group. We examined the changes in students’ knowledge of elements in argumentation and writing performance, after engaging a genre-based writing approach as a pedagogical intervention in the treatment group. We then compared these changes with those of the control group that followed a conventional approach. Students’ written texts in the pretest and posttest along with their responses to the knowledge questionnaires were collected. Results show that the treatment group markedly improved in their knowledge and writing performance, but the control group did not. Specifically, the treatment group improved more noticeably in their expressed knowledge of the structural and linguistic characteristics than their displayed knowledge of the contents, procedures, purposes, and audience consciousness in argumentation. The treatment group also showed significant improvements in their writing performance as shown in discourse structure, substance, and overall writing scores. These findings are discussed and implications for teaching are suggested
Applied linguistics · Argumentation theory · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Philosophy · Psychology
Examining linguistic reasoning and metalinguistic strategies in L2 writing
A triadic discourse-identity-affordance framework for scaffolding the development of research discourse competence
Exploring the role of task-based goal orientations and control-value appraisals in Chinese as a second language writing performance
Research Genres
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Genre and Second Language Writing
Questionnaires in Second Language Research
Feedback in Second Language Writing
Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing
Qualitative Content Analysis
Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students' Writing
‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
Analyzing Genre Exemplars in Preparation for Writing
Calibrating Genre
What does it mean to construct an argument in academic writing? A synthesis of English for general academic purposes and English for specific academic purposes perspectives
Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom
Multilingual academic genre knowledge
Teaching and Researching Genre Knowledge
Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments
Considering what we know and need to know about second language writing
Development and validation of the questionnaire on EFL students’ perceptions of authorial stance in academic writing
Creating Contexts
Learning to write for publication in English through genre-based pedagogy
The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing
Genre pedagogy
How Big Is "Big"? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research
Using Evidence in L2 Argumentative Writing
| Citações por ano | 3 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |