Pathways for learning arithmetic
Distinct dynamics for associative and procedural acquisition
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21306121 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Paula A Maldonado Moscoso (0000-0001-9599-1246, University of Trento), Elisabeth Goettfried (0009-0004-6969-1230, Innsbruck Medical University), Demis Basso (0000-0002-4595-3513, Catholic University of the Maule), Margarete Delazer (0000-0001-6482-4445, Innsbruck Medical University), Michael Knoflach (0000-0001-5576-6562, Innsbruck Medical University), Laura Zamarian (0000-0002-1640-4179, Innsbruck Medical University, autor correspondente), Marcella Piazza (0000-0003-2557-9701, University of Trento), Manuela Piazza |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 271 |
| Páginas | 106482 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106482 |
| PMID | 41678935 |
| OpenAlex | W7128592266 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 29 |
Learning is a multifaceted process that continues across the lifespan, with variation in how different types of knowledge are acquired and retained. One distinction exists between the cognitive skills learned through memory-based associations and those learned through rule-based (strategy) execution. While both forms are central to arithmetic acquisition, little is known about their dynamics in adulthood and their cognitive underpinnings. Addressing this gap is essential for developing effective re-education programs, especially in arithmetic, where learning difficulties can impact personal, academic, and socio-economic outcomes. Here, healthy adults with varying ages and cognitive profiles learned to solve a limited set of novel arithmetic problems using either associative (memory-based) or procedural (strategy-based) methods. Group-level analyses revealed that both learning conditions reached comparable performance. Individual learning trajectories, modeled using a composite efficiency index (inverse efficiency score), revealed similar efficiency gain but distinct dynamics: associative learning showed a steep, abrupt gain, whereas procedural learning progressed gradually along a smoother trajectory. Regression analyses indicated that verbal long-term memory predicted associative learning, while arithmetic abilities specifically predicted procedural learning. Notably, efficiency gains in one condition did not predict gains in the other, further supporting that, notwithstanding their similarities, the two learning trajectories are different in nature. Error analysis further revealed that performance in the procedural condition shifted from calculation-based to retrieval-based processes with practice. These findings demonstrate that associative and procedural arithmetic learning are initially supported by distinct cognitive mechanisms but converge over time, underscoring the importance of considering individual cognitive profiles when designing tailored educational/rehabilitation interventions
Associative learning · Associative property · Cognition · Content-addressable memory · Dynamics (music) · Procedural knowledge · Procedural memory · Sequence learning · Set (abstract data type) · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Reading and Literacy Development · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
On the ability to inhibit thought and action
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Bayes Factors
Are small additions solved by direct retrieval from memory or automated counting procedures? A rejoinder to Chen and Campbell (2018)
Scrutinizing patterns of solution times in alphabet-arithmetic tasks favors counting over retrieval models
The development of mental arithmetic
Preschool language and visuospatial skills respectively predict multiplication and addition/subtraction skills in middle school children
The problem of inference from curves based on group data
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |