Teach like a Luddite
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21369947 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles Logan (0009-0008-9162-0796), C M Logan, T Philip Nichols (0000-0002-8648-1276), Antero Garcia (0000-0002-8417-4723) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Fascículo | 3-4 |
| Páginas | 37-41 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Phi Delta Kappan (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0031-7217 • E-ISSN: 1940-6487 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00317217251405524 |
| OpenAlex | W4417292718 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 9 |
In this article, Charles Logan, T. Philip Nichols, and Antero Garcia argue for resisting the uncritical adoption of “inevitable” automating technologies — such as AI — in schools. To theorize what forms this resistance might take, they turn to perhaps an unusual source: the Luddites. The 19th century textile workers were not anti-technology; they fought technologies used to de-professionalize and disempower them. Learning from the Luddites, they offer three approaches to a Luddite praxis in education: embracing strategic playfulness, developing localized tactics, and building networks of resistance. Technological change is a series of choices about power, work, and dignity — choices that can and should be contested
Democracy · Dignity · Emerging technologies · Praxis · Resistance (ecology) · Cybernetics and Technology in Society · Digital Education and Society · History of Computing Technologies
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |