Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How is motivational interviewing (un)related to self‐determination theory

An empirical study from different healthcare settings

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21392032
AutoresEirik Abildsnes (0000-0002-5454-8560, Department of Psychosocial Health University of Agder Kristiansand Norway, autor correspondente), Nina Elin Andresen (MI Analysis KoRus Vest Bergen Bergen Norway), Solveig Storbækken (MI Analysis KoRus Vest Bergen Bergen Norway), Gro Beate Samdal (0000-0001-6865-1254, Faculty of Health VID Specialized University Bergen Norway), Thomas Mildestvedt (0000-0001-7879-7513, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care University of Bergen Bergen Norway), Eivind Meland (0000-0001-9161-1680, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care University of Bergen Bergen Norway)
Ano2021
Volume62
Fascículo5
Páginas709-716
Data de publicação2021-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.12757
PMID34159598
OpenAlexW3174712818
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas17

To explore how quality aspects and clients’ verbal behaviors in Motivational Interviewing sessions correspond with counsellors’ support of basic psychological needs described in Self‐determination Theory, we conducted a mixed method study with quantitative analyses of transformed qualitative data from counselling sessions. Coding manuals identified if the counselling was consistent with Motivational Interviewing and the support of basic psychological needs. The study supported a conceptual relationship between motivational interviewing (MI) and self‐determination theory (SDT), except for autonomy support which was conceptualized differently in the two approaches. Relational support in SDT and MI were closely linked to each other and were also strongly related to other MI‐congruent and promotive counselors’ verbal behavior. Client amotivation in SDT and change talk in MI were negatively correlated, and clients’ autonomous motivation in SDT was related to change talk in MI. Counselors emphasized relational support, using decisional balance comprehensively, but offered competence support less often. The counseling was, however, sensitive to the clients’ motivational regulation of behavior change

Amotivation · Autonomy · Competence (human resources) · Interview · Intrinsic motivation · Motivational interviewing · Psychological intervention · Self-determination theory · Applied Psychology · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers

    Open Access•William R Miller•Behavioural Psychotherapy•1983

  • The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (Miti 4)

    Open Access•Theresa B Moyers, Lauren N Rowell et al.•Journal of Substance Abuse…•2016

  • Motivational Interviewing and Self–Determination Theory

    David Markland, Richard M Ryan et al.•Journal of Social and Clinical…•2005

  • Self-determination theory

    Open Access•Heather Patrick, George C Williams et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • A Randomized Trial of Methods to Help Clinicians Learn Motivational Interviewing

    William R Miller, Carolina E Yahne et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•2004

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae