Tablet-to-student ratio matters
Learning performance and mental experience of collaborative inquiry
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21743892 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cixiao Wang (0000-0002-6053-8991, Beijing Normal University), Shufan Yu (0000-0001-6845-0065, Central China Normal University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 646-662 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-07-03 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1539-1523 • E-ISSN: 1945-0818 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15391523.2021.2015018 |
| OpenAlex | W4200525908 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 43 |
The use of virtual manipulatives (VMs) in tablets has become increasingly popular in science courses, and previous studies have indicated its educational benefits. However, the tablet-to-student ratio (TSR), which may affect students’ learning, has rarely been examined. This study compares how learning in groups with different TSRs influences the learning performance and mental experience of elementary school students. Participants were 117 fifth-grade students who were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1:1 (i.e., each student had one tablet) and Group 1:m (i.e., each group shared one tablet) to learn the topic of triboelectrification. The results demonstrated that the students with a 1:m TSR performed better than those with a 1:1 TSR in terms of group work; that students with a 1:m TSR showed a higher degree of involvement during collaborative inquiries; and that the retention test, cognitive load, and group-process satisfaction results showed no significant difference between the two conditions. The findings indicate that the positive effect of collaboration on individuals may gradually disappear and the tradeoff between TSR and time of intervention should be considered during instruction
Collaborative learning · Cooperative learning · Educational technology · Mathematics education · Significant difference · Teaching method · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Medicine · Mobile Learning in Education · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology
The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition
Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education
Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks
Tablet use in schools
Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning
Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments
From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory
A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses
Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning
How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories
From Inquiry-Based Science Education to the Approach Based on Scientific Practices
Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning
The affordances and limitations of collaborative science simulations
The effects of an augmented reality based magnetic experimental tool on students' knowledge improvement and cognitive load
The virtual field trip
Integrating interactive learner‐immersed video‐based virtual reality into learning and teaching of physical geography
The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education
Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains
Collaborative Inquiry Learning
Phases of inquiry-based learning
| Citações por ano | 3 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Altamente citado | Não |