Community engagement and the centrality of ‘working relationships’ in health research

Community engagement (CE) is widely accepted as a critical aspect of health research because of its potential to make research more ethical, relevant and well implemented. Although CE activities linked to international health research involving Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs; see author note) have proliferated and are increasingly described in published literature, there is a lack of conceptual clarity around how engagement is understood to ‘work’.1 Ultimately, the evidence base for CE remains underdeveloped,2 despite increasing scholarship. We conducted a realist review–a theory-driven approach to evidence synthesis—to better understand the causal dynamics of CE practices associated with health research in LMICs.3 We selected large malaria trials as the entry point for the review because there is a well-established tradition of CE in malaria research, and because this area provides a good representation of current CE practice in international biomedical research involving LMICs. In this commentary, we summarise and discuss the key findings and implications of the review. Our review highlighted that at the core of CE in health research is the establishment of ‘working relationships’ between researchers and other local stakeholders, influenced by the culture of engagement in research institutions, in turn, shaped by the wider health research paradigm context (figure 1, adapted from Vincent et al 3). Figure 1 Core Community engagement dynamic of working relationships and influences of context. The centrality of working relationships underscores the importance of relational dynamics in CE. Working relationships are influenced by differences between and among researchers and other local stakeholders in wealth, power and culture, and depend on four mutually reinforcing relational dynamics

Centrality · Community engagement · Health services research · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Scholarship · Sociology · Ethics in Clinical Research · Global Health and Surgery · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing

• ‘They (researchers) don't have to justify their presence, why do we have to justify ours?’

  Open Access•Duy Trinh-Hoang, Bernay et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  Incluir item

• Meaningful public involvement

  Open Access•Tomasz Krawczyk, Jan Piasecki et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  Incluir item

• Good and Bad Research Collaborations

  Open Access•Michael Parker, Patricia Kingori et al.•PLoS ONE•2016

  Incluir item

• What’s in a name? Unpacking ‘Community Blank ’ terminology in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health

  Open Access•Sara Dada, Olive Cocoman et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  Incluir item

• Assessing how global health partnerships function

  Open Access•Katrina M Plamondon, Ben Brisboi et al.•Globalization and Health•2021

  Incluir item

• A Framework for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

  Open Access•Rosemary Musesengwa, Moses John Chimbari et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2018

  Incluir item

• Introduction

  Open Access•A Cornwall•IDS Bulletin•2004

  Incluir item

• Towards Relational Sociology

  N Crossley•Towards relational sociology•2010

  Incluir item

• Promoting the social value of research in Kenya

  Open Access•Geoffrey Mbaabu Lairumbi, Sassy Molyneux et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  Incluir item

• Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa

  Open Access•Sassy Molyneux, P W Geissler•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  Incluir item