Do health facility governing committees improve health system performance? An ecological study of Mainland Tanzania

INTRODUCTION: Accountability is crucial for improved functionality of health systems and can be ensured through community participation in health governance. To engage the community in the governance of the local health system, health facility governing committees (HFGCs) have been implemented in several low-income and middle-income countries including Tanzania. However, the effect of HFGCs on health system performance is not well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance in 180 districts of mainland Tanzania, and to assess whether this relationship varies between dispensaries, health centres and hospitals. METHODS: We conducted an ecological study in which the studied outcome was health system performance. The main independent variable was functionality of HFGCs, that is, to what extent these committees reflect the concerns of and connect back to the community. Other explanatory variables included staff availability, location of the facility, gender of the manager of the facility and ownership of the facility. Data on all of the variables were retrieved from the Star Rating Assessment of 2017/2018, measured as mean proportions of all facilities in the districts. The analyses included linear regression for all facility levels combined, as well as for the levels of facility separated (dispensaries, health centres and hospitals). RESULTS: We found a positive relationship between the functionality of the HFGCs and health system performance (β=0.53; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.60). The relationship was stronger for dispensaries (β=0.56; 95% CI=0.50 to 0.63) compared to health centres (β=0.39; 95% CI=0.33 to 0.44) and hospitals (β=0.23; 95% CI=0.15 to 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Districts that have functional HFGCs tend to have better health system performance than others. This relationship is stronger in dispensaries compared to health centres and hospitals. Therefore, we believe the district authorities should allocate resources to strengthen the HFGCs

Biology · China · Ecological study · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Mainland · Mainland China · Population · Public health · Tanzania · Environmental Science · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Ecology

• Ecologic Studies in Epidemiology

  Hal Morgenstern•Annual Review of Public Health•1995

  Incluir item

• Tanzania's Countdown to 2015

  Open Access•Hoviyeh Afnan‐Holmes, Hoviyeh Afnan-Holmes et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2015

  Incluir item

• Decentralisation and government provision of public goods

  John S Akin, John Akin et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2005

  Incluir item

• Accountability and health systems

  Open Access•Derick W Brinkerhoff•Health Policy and Planning•2004

  Incluir item

• Linking governance mechanisms to health outcomes

  Open Access•Dana Karen Ciccone, Taryn Vian et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2014

  Incluir item

• Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region

  Open Access•Nahitun Naher, Dina Balabanova et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2020

  Incluir item

• A systematic review of the literature for evidence on health facility committees in low- and middle-income countries

  Open Access•David C McCoy, Jennifer A Hall et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  Incluir item

• Introduction

  Open Access•A Cornwall, Henry Lucas et al.•IDS Bulletin•2000

  Incluir item

• Decentralization and Governance

  Open Access•Jean-Paul Faguet•World Development•2013

  Incluir item