Determinants of object choice and object attachment

Compensatory consumption in compulsive buying–shopping disorder and hoarding disorder

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21881990
AutoresMelissa M Norberg (0000-0001-7840-9007, Macquarie University), Jonathan David (0000-0003-0620-0233, Macquarie University), Cassandra Crone (0000-0002-0637-8843, Macquarie University), Vani Kakar (0000-0002-2056-014X, Macquarie University), Cathy Kwok (0000-0003-0387-1058, Macquarie University), Jake Olivier (0000-0002-3144-4507, UNSW Sydney), Jessica R Grisham (0000-0002-5035-1744, UNSW Sydney)
Ano2020
Volume9
Fascículo1
Páginas153-162
Data de publicação2020-01-08
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Behavioral Addictions (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2062-5871 • E-ISSN: 2063-5303
EditoraAkademiai Kiado Zrt. (PUBLISHER • HU)
DOI10.1556/2006.8.2019.68
PMID31914783
OpenAlexW3000283467
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas59

Background and aims Individuals who meet criteria for compulsive buying–shopping disorder (i.e., acquiring problems only) or hoarding disorder (i.e., acquiring and discarding problems) may acquire possessions to compensate for unmet belonging needs, but may do so in different ways. Those with compulsive buying–shopping disorder may acquire objects that they believe will relieve the distress associated with unmet belonging needs (e.g., objects that distract or comfort), whereas those with hoarding disorder may acquire objects that they believe achieve belonging needs (e.g., objects that have interpersonal connotations). Accordingly, this study examined whether a belongingness threat would drive individuals who excessively acquire possessions to choose a human-like object (person-shaped tea holder) or a comfort item (box of chamomile tea). Methods One hundred seventy-five participants (57 self-reported excessive acquiring only; 118 self-reported excessive acquiring and difficulty discarding) recalled a time when they either felt supported or unsupported by a significant other before choosing an object to take home with them. Participants rated how anthropomorphic and comforting the objects were as well as how attached they became to their chosen object. Results Unsupported individuals were more likely to acquire the comfort item than supported individuals; however, individuals with both acquiring and discarding problems were more likely to acquire the human-like item than those with an acquiring problem only. Comfort and anthropomorphism ratings predicted object choice and attachment. Discussions and conclusion The current findings extend the Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model to include what factors determine strategy choice and object attachment

Compulsive behavior · Distress · Feeding behavior · Hoarding disorder · Interpersonal communication · Clinical Psychology · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies · Gambling Behavior and Treatments · Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders · Psychology · Social Psychology