The Impact of Sociomaterials on Architectural Learning Processes in Virtual and Physical Design Studios
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22047321 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Barak Pelman (0000-0002-9795-055X, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, autor correspondente), Amit Zoran (0000-0002-9673-9779, Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Amit Raphael Zoran (The Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 240 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-02-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15020240 |
| OpenAlex | W4407564960 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 58 |
Since architectural education has been integrated into academic campuses, the design studio has become its most prominent pedagogical approach. However, in the last three decades, advances in computer-aided design (CAD) and online communication led to the development of virtual design studio (VDS) formats, which gained prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. VDS and physical design studio (PDS) are characterized by different sociomaterial environments, each offering unique learning opportunities. This study examines how these environments influence learning processes, analyzing two desk critique sessions—one conducted in a VDS and the other in a PDS. Our data, comprising video recordings and on-site observations, were analyzed and interpreted through a sociomaterial lens. The findings indicate that PDS facilitates more spontaneous interactions, allowing for the communication of complex ideas and better addressing misunderstandings compared to VDS, which is constrained by the limitations of digital communication platforms. This research provides both theoretical and pedagogical contributions. Theoretically, it demonstrates how architectural concepts emerge through sociomaterial interactions, framing architectural learning as material practice. In addition, it illustrates the role of sociomaterials in communicating complex ideas and shaping collaborative learning processes. Pedagogically, the findings emphasize the importance of creating rich sociomaterial environments that effectively support intended learning processes
Architectural design · Architectural engineering · Art · Human–computer interaction · Instructional design · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Studio · Visual arts · Architecture and Computational Design · Computer Science · Engineering · Psychology · Architecture
Supersizing the Mind
Communities of Practice
Actor-Network Theory in Education
Cognition in the Wild
How Things Shape the Mind
Materiality and change
Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language
Sociomaterial Practices
Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory
“Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”
Wicked Problems in Design Thinking
Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences
The Extended Mind
Collaborative and participatory design approach in architectural design studios
The Future of Design Studio Education
A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018
Reassembling the Social
Students’ views of the architectural design review
Lost in translation
Signature pedagogies in the professions
Nature, Culture, Clitter
The situativity of knowing, learning, and research
The sociomateriality of organisational life
On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One
Situated Learning
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |