Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Addressing a gap in community-engaged research

Reporting results of congregations’ implementation capacity assessment to research participants

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22074012
AutoresJemal Gishe (Tennessee State University, autor correspondente), Rebecca Selove (0000-0003-2929-8763, Tennessee State University), Sanjoy Saha (0000-0002-5120-3401, Tennessee State University), Thomas J Waltz (0000-0001-7976-430X, Eastern Michigan University), Korab Idrizi (Tennessee State University), Abdulrahman Sankoh (Tennessee State University), Melissa Arismendy (Tennessee State University), Kristin Clarkson (0000-0002-0523-4469, First Congregational Church), Neely Williams (0000-0001-8870-224X, Community Health Alliance), Omaran Lee (0000-0001-6055-7116, WestCare Foundation), Omaràn D Lee (SíCare Powered by, Reach One Teach One Foundation Inc), Sharon Jones (Vanderbilt University), Leah Alexander (Meharry Medical College), David G Schlundt (0000-0001-7069-9644, Vanderbilt University)
Ano2026
Volume14
Páginas1826775-1826775
Data de publicação2026-05-28
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1826775
PMID42293674
OpenAlexW7162650894
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas22

Background: Community-engaged research depends on sharing findings effectively; however, few tools translate implementation capacity and readiness data into actionable feedback. This gap limits community organizations' ability to use results to guide health program implementation, build trust in research, and sustain ongoing participation. This study developed and used a tailored survey response report process for congregations participating in the Engaging Partners in Caring Communities (EPICC) project to support implementation planning and technical assistance. Methods: The EPICC CFIR-informed survey, grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), was completed by teams from 30 congregations after they selected a health promotion evidence-based program. A multi-step process, informed by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), was developed to generate congregation-specific feedback reports. Satisfaction with the reports was assessed using responses from 80 participants. Results: Congregations varied widely in size and implementation capacity. Cost, design quality, and readiness for implementation were identified as the most common challenges. Tailored strength-based survey response reports were generated for all congregations. Satisfaction was high, with over 95% of respondents rating the reports as accurate, helpful, and satisfactory or better in reflecting their congregation and guiding implementation planning. Conclusion: A theory-based, strength-focused CFIR-ERIC assessment and feedback process was successfully adapted for faith-based congregations, extending implementation frameworks beyond healthcare settings. Tailored reports and interactive feedback were highly acceptable and provided actionable guidance for readiness and program implementation. This scalable approach may facilitate translation of implementation science to diverse community settings, although effects on implementation outcomes require further study

Capacity building · Grounded theory · Health care · Implementation research · Knowledge translation · Program evaluation · Scalability · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Religion, Society, and Development

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • A refined compilation of implementation strategies

    Open Access•Byron J Powell, Thomas J Waltz et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Using Stakeholder Input to Inform an Innovative Research and Policy Initiative to Improve Depression in Safety Net Communities

    Dmitry Khodyakov, Pluscedia Williams et al.•Progress in community health…•2017

  • Engage for Equity

    Open Access•Nina Wallerstein•American Journal of Community…•2021

  • We’ve Come This Far by Faith

    Laprincess C Brewer, D R Williams•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships

    Open Access•Karen M Emmons, Samuel R Mendez et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2023

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae