Reporting Guidelines for Large Language Models in Human–Robot Interaction
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22190804 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cynthia Matuszek (0000-0003-1383-8120, University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Tom Williams (0000-0002-7901-4987, Colorado School of Mines), Nick DePalma (0000-0003-0531-743X, Los Angeles Community College District), Ross Mead (0000-0002-5664-4687, IntraMedical Imaging (United States)), Ruchen Wen (0000-0003-1590-1787, University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Eike Schneiders (0000-0002-8372-1684, University of Southampton), Casey Kennington (0000-0001-6654-8966, Boise State University), Alemitu Bezabih (0000-0001-9603-8537, Colorado School of Mines) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 1-24 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-03-31 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2573-9522 • E-ISSN: 2573-9522 |
| Editora | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1145/3777552 |
| OpenAlex | W4416767381 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 74 |
The comparatively recent advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has resulted in a wide array of new capabilities and components relevant to Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers. LLMs are being applied to vision, manipulation, planning, reasoning, learning, and HRI problems, frequently as “Scarecrows,” in which LLMs serve as black box modules integrated into robot architectures for the purpose of quickly enabling full-pipeline solutions. However, despite this explosion of applications, general questions remain about the best ways to incorporate LLMs into robot architectures, appropriate safety and guardrail considerations, and, critically, how to report properly on HRI research that involves LLMs. In this article, we explore the question of reporting guidelines for HRI researchers who utilize Scarecrows in robot architectures. We identify five key stakeholder groups in the HRI research process, discuss what information each group needs from HRI researchers, and identify appropriate mechanisms for conveying that information from HRI researchers to stakeholders either directly or indirectly. We contribute a set of suggested guidelines regarding what information should be included when researchers disseminate information about HRI research that uses LLMs
Dissemination · Human–robot interaction · Information model · Robot · Stakeholder · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Model Cards for Model Reporting
The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking
Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data
Closing the AI accountability gap
From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’
Datasheets for datasets
Explaining the privacy paradox
Scarecrows in Oz
Users’ Preferences for Smart Home Automation – Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust
What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services
Humans as a Service
The Whiteness of AI
Analyzing the legal roots and moral core of digital consent
| Altamente citado | Não |
|---|