Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Reporting Guidelines for Large Language Models in Human–Robot Interaction

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22190804
AutoresCynthia Matuszek (0000-0003-1383-8120, University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Tom Williams (0000-0002-7901-4987, Colorado School of Mines), Nick DePalma (0000-0003-0531-743X, Los Angeles Community College District), Ross Mead (0000-0002-5664-4687, IntraMedical Imaging (United States)), Ruchen Wen (0000-0003-1590-1787, University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Eike Schneiders (0000-0002-8372-1684, University of Southampton), Casey Kennington (0000-0001-6654-8966, Boise State University), Alemitu Bezabih (0000-0001-9603-8537, Colorado School of Mines)
Ano2026
Volume15
Fascículo2
Páginas1-24
Data de publicação2026-03-31
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2573-9522 • E-ISSN: 2573-9522
EditoraAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1145/3777552
OpenAlexW4416767381
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas74

The comparatively recent advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has resulted in a wide array of new capabilities and components relevant to Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers. LLMs are being applied to vision, manipulation, planning, reasoning, learning, and HRI problems, frequently as “Scarecrows,” in which LLMs serve as black box modules integrated into robot architectures for the purpose of quickly enabling full-pipeline solutions. However, despite this explosion of applications, general questions remain about the best ways to incorporate LLMs into robot architectures, appropriate safety and guardrail considerations, and, critically, how to report properly on HRI research that involves LLMs. In this article, we explore the question of reporting guidelines for HRI researchers who utilize Scarecrows in robot architectures. We identify five key stakeholder groups in the HRI research process, discuss what information each group needs from HRI researchers, and identify appropriate mechanisms for conveying that information from HRI researchers to stakeholders either directly or indirectly. We contribute a set of suggested guidelines regarding what information should be included when researchers disseminate information about HRI research that uses LLMs

Dissemination · Human–robot interaction · Information model · Robot · Stakeholder · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Social Robot Interaction and HRI

  • Model Cards for Model Reporting

    Open Access•Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu et al.•Proceedings of the Conference on…•2019

  • The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking

    Open Access•Hao-Ping Lee, Advait Sarkar et al.•Proceedings of the 2025 CHI…•2025

  • Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI

    Laurel Riek•Journal of Human-Robot Interaction•2012

  • Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour

    Open Access•Spyros Kokolakis•Computers & Security•2017

  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data

    Open Access•Alon Halevy, Peter Norvig et al.•IEEE Intelligent Systems•2009

  • Closing the AI accountability gap

    Open Access•Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Andrew Smart et al.•Proceedings of the 2020…•2020

  • From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’

    Nathalie A Smuha•Law, Innovation and Technology•2021

  • Datasheets for datasets

    Open Access•Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern et al.•Communications of the ACM•2021

  • Explaining the privacy paradox

    Open Access•Nina Gerber, Paul Gerber et al.•Computers & Security•2018

  • Scarecrows in Oz

    Open Access•Tom Williams, Cynthia Matuszek et al.•ACM Transactions on Human-Robot…•2024

  • Users’ Preferences for Smart Home Automation – Investigating Aspects of Privacy and Trust

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Schomakers, Hannah Biermann et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2021

  • What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services

    Open Access•Areum Hong, Changi Nam et al.•Telecommunications Policy•2020

  • Humans as a Service

    Jeremias Adams-Prassl, Jeremias Prassl•Humans as a Service•2018

  • The Whiteness of AI

    Open Access•Syto Cavé, Kanta Dihal•Philosophy & Technology•2020

  • Analyzing the legal roots and moral core of digital consent

    Open Access•Elizabeth Edenberg, Meg Leta Jones•New Media & Society•2019

Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae