Policies for supporting caregivers of older adults with long-term care needs in EU countries
A systematic review
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22427013 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eva Bei (0000-0002-3093-0829), Marco Albertini (0000-0003-0344-3002), Federico Toth (0000-0002-1596-6460) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | European Journal of Ageing (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1613-9372 • E-ISSN: 1613-9380 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10433-026-00907-y |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 42 |
In the context of population ageing, increasing long-term care needs and constraints on welfare spending, informal caregivers assume a pivotal role as providers of long-term care. This systematic review synthesises reported data on the diverse support policies implemented across the European Union (EU) to assist them. Findings from 35 studies and reports published between 2011 and 2025 suggest that, despite similar demographic challenges, policies diverge significantly, with some EU countries to have established mechanisms beyond financial assistance to support carers, while others, particularly those located in Eastern and Southern EU, to offer less comprehensive support. While the frameworks of defamilialisation (Nordic), supported familialism (Continental), and familialism by default (Southern and Eastern Europe) provide a useful analytical lens to our findings, the review also identifies significant heterogeneities within welfare regimes and even within countries, often driven by decentralisation and regional disparities. Across all models, financial support via cash-for-care schemes and in-kind respite care are the most common instruments, though their generosity and comprehensiveness vary substantially. In contrast, policies such as training, counselling, and flexible work guarantees are less developed, with their availability and access, however, varying significantly across the EU. Furthermore, the review identifies critical gaps in the geographical coverage of existing literature, with certain Southern and Eastern EU countries being particularly understudied. The synthesised evidence provides key implications for policymaking, thoroughly mapping the implementation of diverse social care policies as reported in the international literature.
How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms
Informal Caregiving for Elders in Sweden
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
A longitudinal study on public policy and the health of in-house caregivers in Europe
Developing a Framework for the Support of Informal Caregivers
Comparative study on informal caregiver support policies in the long-term care system for older adults among South Korea, the United Kingdom, and Sweden
Care Arrangements in Dementia Care Networks
Varieties of familialism
The 'Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe
Indicators of familialism and defamilialization in long-term care
Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report
Measuring active and healthy ageing in Europe
Informal caregiving and well-being in Europe
Re-conceptualising the relationship between de-familialisation and familialisation and the implications for gender equality – the case of long-term care policies for older people
Carers’ experiences of timely access to and use of dementia care services in eight European countries
Coverage versus generosity
The turn to optional familialism through the market
Organization and Supply of Long‐term Care Services for the Elderly
Flexible work arrangements for work-life balance
Support for Informal Carers
Worlds, Families, Regimes
Understanding the effects of informal caregiving on health and well-being
Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |