Uncertain Risks

Salmon Science, Harm, and Ignorance in Canada

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2259461
AutoresMaximilian Viatori (Department of World Languages and Cultures Iowa State University Ames IA 50011 USA, autor correspondente)
Ano2019
Volume121
Fascículo2
Páginas325-337
Data de publicação2019-06-01
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Anthropologist (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-7294 • E-ISSN: 1548-1433
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/aman.13241
OpenAlexW2938830920
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas36

In this article, I examine the public testimonies of expert witnesses during a Canadian federal commission charged with investigating the reasons for dramatic declines of sockeye salmon returning to British Columbia's Fraser River in 2009. These testimonies were intended to provide a foundation of expert opinion upon which clear policy recommendations could be made. However, the hearings were beset by debates over the ability of scientific research to assess harms to wild salmon. Through a discursive analysis of knowledge performances during the commission's hearings, I argue that neoliberalized approaches to evaluating harm and risk enable the production of uncertainty as a political strategy for blocking regulation and letting markets solve ecological crises. Furthermore, my analysis of expert testimonies underscores the degree to which public discussions of science and ecological crises are about the performance of (non)knowledge and why more scientific information has little impact on their outcomes. [uncertainty, risk, ignorance, science, salmon

Climate change · Commission · Environmental ethics · Foundation (evidence · Harm · Ignorance · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Scientific consensus · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Ecology · Law · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Risk Perception and Management

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub