Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Ultra-processed food narratives in social media forum posts

A content analysis of Reddit threads

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22945199
AutoresEmily Denniss (0000-0002-9631-050X, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University , 75 Pigdons Rd, Geelong 3216 ,, autor correspondente), Patricia Ribeiro De Melo (0000-0001-5010-3292, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University , 75 Pigdons Rd, Geelong 3216 ,), Katherine Sievert (0000-0003-4617-8034, Deakin University), Cherie Russell (0000-0003-1251-4810, Deakin University), Priscila Pereira Machado (0000-0003-4607-5094, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University , 75 Pigdons Rd, Geelong 3216 ,), Priscila Machado (Deakin University)
Ano2026
Volume41
Fascículo1
Data de publicação2026-01-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Promotion International (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/heapro/daag007
PMID41640294
OpenAlexW7127974890
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas63

Ultra-processed food (UPF) production and consumption, associated with chronic disease and environmental degradation, is increasing globally. The UPF concept has gained public attention in recent years and has raised concerns of confusion among the public. This study aimed to explore Reddit—a popular online forum platform—discussions about UPFs to identify the main topics of discussion and how UPFs are discussed. A descriptive constructivist approach to qualitative content analysis was used to analyse threads from the r/ultraprocessedfood subreddit, with over 34 000 subscribers. The ‘top’ 50 threads from the subreddit (i.e. threads with highest engagement) were collected in January 2025. A coding framework was developed deductively to capture a range of UPF issues, including impacts and causal mechanisms. Two authors coded 50 threads comprised of 2730 comments and posted between 2023 and 2025. The most frequently discussed topic was food [n = 45 (90%) threads, n = 1188 (43.5%) comments], followed by dietary patterns [n = 37 (74%) threads, n = 415 (15.2%) comments], health [n = 43 (86%) threads, n = 404 (14.8%) comments], food system [n = 34 (68%) threads, n = 323 (11.8%) comments], and nutri-biochemical components [n = 34 (68%) threads, n = 322 (11.8%) comments]. The least discussed topic was planetary health [n = 13 (26%) threads, n = 25 (0.9%) comments]. Most comments contained information (n = 2,088, 76.5%) or personal strategies/experiences (n = 901, 33%), with a smaller number containing questions (n = 315, 11.5%) or expressing confusion (n = 15, 0.01%). Reddit users often expressed a love for cooking and anger towards unethical food industry practices and UPF harms. Public health communications may benefit from framing UPF messaging around social justice. This paper includes discussion of disordered eating.

Coding (social sciences) · Confusion · Content analysis · Descriptive statistics · Narrative · Online discussion · Social media · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease

  • Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes

    Open Access•Melissa M Lane, Elizabeth Gamage et al.•BMJ•2024

  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Media Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Messages

    Rebekah H Nagler•Journal of Health Communication•2014

  • Beyond the Guise of Saturation

    Kori A Ladonna, Anthony R Artino et al.•Journal of Graduate Medical…•2021

  • Whatever happened to qualitative description?

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski•Research in Nursing & Health•2000

  • Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating

    Open Access•Barry M Popkin, Simón Barquera et al.•The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology•2021

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • From plate to post

    Open Access•Eloise-kate Litterbach, Emily Denniss et al.•Health Promotion International•2025

  • Unhealthy food advertising on social media

    Open Access•Tanita Northcott, Katherine Sievert et al.•Health Promotion International•2025

  • Social media and the spread of misinformation

    Open Access•Emily Denniss, Rebecca Lindberg•Health Promotion International•2025

  • Content analysis of conversations on Reddit

    Open Access•Jamie Guillory, Sarah Trigger et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2024

  • Communication research to improve engagement with climate change and human health

    Open Access•Eryn Campbell, Sri Saahitya Uppalapati et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Perceptions of ultra processed food are associated with strategies for identifying healthy foods in online survey of adults living in Vermont

    Open Access•Nick Rose, Jane Kolodinsky•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Turning users into ‘unofficial brand ambassadors’

    Open Access•Ruby Brooks, Rebecca Christidis et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Marketing to Youth in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Sally Dunlop, Becky Freeman et al.•Media and Communication•2016

  • Fussy eating in toddlers

    Open Access•Kylie Fraser, Brittany Markides et al.•Maternal and Child Nutrition•2021

  • Associations between conflicting nutrition information, nutrition confusion and backlash among consumers in the UK

    Open Access•Santosh Vijaykumar, Andrew McNeill et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2021

  • Global trends in added sugars and non-nutritive sweetener use in the packaged food supply

    Open Access•Cherie Russell, Phillip Baker et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2023

  • Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information

    Open Access•Emily Denniss, Rebecca Lindberg et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2023

  • Ultra-processed foods

    Open Access•Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Geoffrey Cannon et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2019

  • How food companies use social media to influence policy debates

    Open Access•Daniel Hunt•Public Health Nutrition•2021

  • From harmful nutrients to ultra-processed foods

    Open Access•Kim Anastasiou, Patricia Ribeiro De Melo et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2023

  • The use of food processing terminology in Australian news media

    Open Access•Cherie Russell, Katherine Sievert et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2024

  • Concerned but confused

    Open Access•Eden M Barrett, Bella Sträuli et al.•Appetite•2025

  • Consumers’ conceptualization of ultra-processed foods

    Open Access•Gastón Ares, Leticia Vidal et al.•Appetite•2016

  • Why public dismissal of nutrition science makes sense

    Open Access•Bart Penders•British Food Journal•2018

  • The UN Decade of Nutrition, the Nova food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing

    Open Access•Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Geoffrey Cannon et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2017

  • A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing

    Open Access•Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Renata Bertazzi Levy et al.•Cadernos de Saude Publica•2010

  • Now I see it, now I don't

    Open Access•Roni Berger•Qualitative Research•2015

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae