Process evaluation of workplace health promotion in a sheltered workplace
A care ethics perspective
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22945340 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Hanneke van Heijster (0000-0001-9064-7788, Wageningen University & Research, autor correspondente), Jantien van Berkel (0000-0003-3400-9655, Wageningen University & Research), Minne Bakker (Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU University , Amsterdam , The Netherlands), Cécile R L Boot (0000-0001-5021-9957), Cécile Boot (Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam , The Netherlands), Emely De Vet (0000-0002-4452-2367, Wageningen University & Research) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Health Promotion International (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0957-4824 • E-ISSN: 1460-2245 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapro/daad031 |
| PMID | 37057390 |
| OpenAlex | W4365479278 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Despite the potential health benefits of workplace health promotion for employees in sheltered workplaces, participation is often limited. The aim of this study was (i) to understand this limited participation, and (ii) to find opportunities for adapting workplace health promotion, such that it better meets the needs of the target population. A responsive process evaluation of an extensive multi-component workplace health promotion program targeting lifestyle behaviors, financial behaviors, literacy and citizenship, was performed in a large, sheltered workplace in the Netherlands (>3500 employees). To understand the limited participation, interviews with employees (n = 8), supervisors (n = 7) and managers (n = 2), and 10 participant observations were performed. To find opportunities for improving workplace health promotion in the sheltered workplace, 7 dialogs with employees were performed (n = 30). The interview data on the barriers for participation were evaluated through the lens of care ethics, as this allowed to understand the role of various stakeholders in the limited participation, as well as the indirect role of the institutional context. Findings showed that participation in workplace health promotion could increase if it is organized in a way that it encourages employees to work on health together, allow to tailor activities to different needs and capabilities of employees, and connects activities to employees’ daily lives. A strength of this study is that the responsive process evaluation focused both on barriers for participation, as well as on opportunities to increase participation.
Engineering ethics · Health care · Health promotion · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Process (computing) · Promotion (chess) · Public health · Public relations · Sociology · Workplace health promotion · Computer Science · Engineering · Health, psychology, and well-being · Medicine · Nursing · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology · Workplace Health and Well-being
Opening the black box
The Ethics of Care
Effective elements of care-physical activity initiatives for adults with a low socioeconomic status
Worksite health promotion and social inequalities in health
Workplace Health Promotion in German Social Firms—Offers, Needs and Challenges from the Perspectives of Employees, Supervisors and Experts
Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics
Responsive Evaluation in the Interference Zone Between System and Lifeworld
The Place of Care
Social Identity Map
Different Approaches to Cross-Lingual Focus Groups
There Is Nothing Wrong with Me
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |