Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Logic and the autonomy of ethics

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23182011
AutoresCharles Pigden (University of Otago, autor correspondente), Charles R Pigden
Ano1989
Volume67
Fascículo2
Páginas127-151
Data de publicação1989-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAustralasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00048408912343731
OpenAlexW2150602032
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas20
Referências citadas34

In every system of morality I have hitherto met with, I have always remark'd that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary way of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God or makes observations concerning human affairs; when of a sudden I am surpriz'd to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions is and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought or ought not. This change is imperceptible, but is, however, of the last consequence. For as this ought or ought not expresses some new relation or affirmation, 'tis necessary that it should be observ'd and explain'd; and at the same time a reason should be given for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others which are entirely different from it. David Hume, Treatise, III.i.3. 1.

Autonomy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Testy modelu świata i teorii umysłu jako podstawa budowy zaufania do podmiotów moralnych typu AGI

    Open Access•Krzysztof Sołoducha, Paweł Stacewicz•Perspektywy Kultury•2023

  • Knowledge as a Non‐Normative Relation

    Open Access•Kurt Sylvan•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Is’–‘Ought’ Derivations and Ethical Taxonomies

    Open Access•Hill•philoSOPHIA•2008

  • Giving up Hume's Guillotine

    Aaron Wolf•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2014

  • Non-Naturalist Moral Realism, Autonomy and Entanglement

    Open Access•Graham Oddie•Topoi•2017

  • Is it always fallacious to derive values from facts

    Open Access•Mark T Nelson•Argumentation•1995

  • From Ideal Worlds to Ideality

    Open Access•Craig Warmke•Journal of the American…•2023

  • Why Do We “Must” and “Should”?—Bridging the Gap from “Is” to “Ought”

    Chen Bo•Social Sciences in China•2025

  • The Reliable Route from Nonmoral Evidence to Moral Conclusions

    Open Access•Neil Sinhababu•Erkenntnis•2024

  • On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law

    Open Access•Samuele Chilovi, Daniel Wodak•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Two Versions of Hume's Law

    Open Access•Campbell Brown•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2015

  • Beyond Ought-Implies-Can

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2024

  • The is-ought gap and the substitution criterion

    M Chen•South African Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Rebutting formally valid counterexamples to the Humean “is-ought” dictum

    Open Access•Daniel Guevara•Synthese•2008

  • No normative free lunch

    Open Access•Singa Behrens•Synthese•2021

  • Truthmaking and the is–ought gap

    Open Access•Kit Fine•Synthese•2021

  • Introduction to the special issue “Logical perspectives on science and cognition”

    Open Access•Christian J Feldbacher-Escamilla, Alexander Gebharter et al.•Synthese•2020

  • Can the empirical sciences contribute to the moral realism/anti-realism debate

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler•Synthese•2018

  • Against inferential moral knowledge

    Open Access•M Backes•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Business ethics, the social sciences, and moral philosophy

    Open Access•Manuel Velasquez•Social Justice Research•1996

  • Proofs and Refutations

    Open Access•Imre Lakatos, John Worrall et al.•Proofs and Refutations•1976

  • Modal Logic

    Open Access•Brian F Chellas•Modal Logic•1980

  • Moral Thinking

    R M Hare•Moral thinking•1981

  • A Short History of Ethics

    Alasdair Macintyre•A SHORT HISTORY OF Ethics•1967

  • Good and Evil

    P T Geach•Analysis•1956

  • Whatever happened to Deontic Logic?

    Peter T Geach•Logic and Ethics•1991

  • The Is-Ought Question

    Open Access•W D Hudson•Is-Ought Question•1969

  • A Short History of Ethics

    Alasdair Macintyre•A Short History of Ethics•2017

  • Moral Facts and Moral Knowledge

    Open Access•William G Lycan•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•1986

  • The autonomy of ethics

    A N Prior•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1960

  • Problems of the Self

    Open Access•Bernard Williams•Problems of the Self•1973

  • Whatever happened to deontic logic?

    Open Access•Peter T Geach•philoSOPHIA•1982

  • Moral Dilemmas and the Logic of Deontic Notions

    Richard Routley, Val Plumwood•Paraconsistent Logic, Essay on…•1989

  • Logic and the Basis of Ethics

    A N Prior•Logic and the basis of ethics•1963

  • On the Logic of Norms and Actions

    Georg Henrik Von Wright•New Studies in Deontic Logic•1981

  • Reason, Truth and History

    Open Access•Hilary Putnam•Reason, Truth and History•1981

  • Deontic Logic

    Dagfinn Føllesdal, Risto Hilpinen•Deontic Logic•1970

  • David Hume

    David Hume, P H Nidditch•Enquiries concerning human…•1975

  • How to Derive "Ought" From "Is

    John R Searle•The Philosophical Review•1964

  • Defining the Autonomy of Ethics

    Frank Jackson•The Philosophical Review•1974

  • Moral realism and the sceptical arguments from disagreement and queerness

    David O Brink•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1984

  • The British Moralists

    Open Access•Charles Vereker•Political Studies•1970

Obras citantes distintas20
Citações por ano0,65
Intervalo de citações1995 - 2025 (31)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 18
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae