Unrealistic Gendered and Relationship-Specific Beliefs

This study focuses on beliefs about intimate relationships, and how these beliefs are related to individuals' experiences in ongoing romantic relationships. More specifically, we examined how unrealistic beliefs contributed to commitment and components of the investment model (rewards, costs, match to ideal comparison level, alternatives, investment size, barriers). Two types of beliefs were examined: unrealistic gendered beliefs focused on assumptions about irreconcilable differences in men and women's relational needs, whereas unrealistic relationship-specific beliefs reflected standards about perfection and mindreading in interactions with one's romantic partner. Females' unrealistic gendered beliefs and relationship-specific beliefs were associated with more alternatives, lower match to ideal comparison levels, and lower commitment. Regression analyses indicated that components of the investment model mediated the relationship between (i) commitment and gendered relationship beliefs and (ii) commitment and relationship-specific beliefs for females. Males' gendered beliefs were not related to commitment or any component of the investment model; relationship-specific beliefs were associated with greater costs and greater alternatives. No mediating effects in the relationship between commitment and relationship-specific beliefs were detected for males. The results are discussed in the context of previous research and gender socialization

Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Ideal (ethics · Investment (military · Romance · Socialization · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges

• Marital Problem Solving Interaction and Satisfaction

  Ayca Sarac, Ismail Sanberk•American Journal of Family Therapy•2022

  Incluir item

• Attachment style, relationship status, gender and relational competences among young adults

  Open Access•Katarzyna Adamczyk, Aleksandra Pilarska•Polish Psychological Bulletin•2012

  Incluir item

• We Are Together, but How Much Are We Truly ‘We’

  Open Access•Burcu Özgülük Üçok, Selin Onaylı et al.•Emerging Adulthood•2025

  Incluir item

• Loving the Green-Eyed Monster

  Open Access•Lauren P Hartwell, T Michele Humphries et al.•Gender Issues•2015

  Incluir item

• Online Infidelity

  Open Access•Ilan Aviram, Yair Amichai-Hamburger et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  Incluir item

• Hermeneutic Labor

  Open Access•Ellie Anderson•Hypatia•2023

  Incluir item

• Examining the Bidirectional Nature of Topic Avoidance and Relationship Dissatisfaction

  Anne F Merrill, T D Afifi•Communication Monographs•2012

  Incluir item

• The Role of Network Support and Interference in Women's Perception of Romantic, Friend, and Parental Relationships

  Open Access•Laura Bryan, Jacki Fitzpatrick et al.•Sex Roles•2001

  Incluir item

• Longitudinal changes in interparental conflict and impacts on children’s socioemotional skills

  Open Access•Qiujie Gong, Karen Z Kramer•Journal of Social and Personal…•2026

  Incluir item

• Explaining personal and constraint commitment in close relationships

  Open Access•Michelle Givertz, C Segrin•Journal of Social and Personal…•2005

  Incluir item

• Great expectations

  Open Access•Sarah A Vannier, Lucia F O’sulliban et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2018

  Incluir item

• Unrealistic Gendered and Relationship-Specific Beliefs

  Open Access•Jacki Fitzpatrick, Donna L Sollie•Journal of Social and Personal…•1999

  Incluir item

• Passion, connection, and destiny

  Open Access•Sarah A Vannier, Lucia F O’sulliban et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2017

  Incluir item

• "The "standards for openness hypothesis

  Open Access•Tamara D Afifi, Andrea Joseph et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2012

  Incluir item

• Marital Meaning

  Open Access•Scott S Hall•Journal of Family Issues•2006

  Incluir item

• Family Communication Standards

  Open Access•John P Caughlin•Human Communication Research•2003

  Incluir item

• Handbook of Personal Relationships

  Steve Duck•Handbook of Personal Relationships•1996

  Incluir item

• Women and families

  Kristine M Baber•Women and families•1992

  Incluir item

• Cognition in close relationships

  Frank D Fincham, Garth J O Fletcher•Cognition in close relationships•1991

  Incluir item

• Cognition and relationship maladjustment

  Roy J Eidelson, Norman Epstein et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•1982

  Incluir item

• Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships

  Open Access•Anita L Vangelisti, John A Daly•Personal Relationships•1997

  Incluir item

• Perceived benefits and costs of romantic relationships for women and men

  Open Access•Constantine Sedikides, M B Oliver et al.•Personal Relationships•1994

  Incluir item

• Assessment of relationship thinking in dating relationships

  Open Access•Rodney M Cate, James Koval et al.•Personal Relationships•1995

  Incluir item

• Accounts of relational dissolution

  William R Cupach, Sandra Metts•Communication Monographs•1986

  Incluir item

• Predicting Satisfaction and Commitment in Adult Romantic Involvements

  Caryl E Rusbult, Dennis J Johnson et al.•Social Psychology Quarterly•1986

  Incluir item

• The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

  Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  Incluir item

• The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

  Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  Incluir item

• Cognitive interdependence

  Christopher R Agnew, Paul A M Van Lange et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  Incluir item

• A longitudinal test of the investment model

  Caryl E Rusbult•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  Incluir item

• A Social Psychological Perspective on Marital Dissolution

  Open Access•George Levinger•Journal of Social Issues•1976

  Incluir item

• Satisfaction and Commitment in Homosexual and Heterosexual Relationships

  Sally M Duffy, Caryl E Rusbult•Journal of Homosexuality•1986

  Incluir item

• Commitment to Dating Relationships and Cross-Sex Friendships in America and China

  Open Access•Yuan-Huei W Lin, Yuan‐huei W Lin et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1995

  Incluir item

• Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and Examination of the Effects of Gender and Gender-Role Orientation

  Open Access•Sprecher, Susan Sprecher et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1989

  Incluir item

• Individual and Partner Love Styles

  Open Access•Gregory D Morrow, E M Clark et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1995

  Incluir item

• Unrealistic Gendered and Relationship-Specific Beliefs

  Open Access•Jacki Fitzpatrick, Donna L Sollie•Journal of Social and Personal…•1999

  Incluir item

• The Development of Investment and Commitment Scales for Predicting Continuity of Personal Relationships

  Open Access•Mary Lund•Journal of Social and Personal…•1985

  Incluir item

• Commitment Processes in Close Relationships

  Open Access•Caryl E Rusbult, Bram P Buunk•Journal of Social and Personal…•1993

  Incluir item

• Examining Personal Relationship Thinking

  Open Access•Robert W Martins, Robert Martins et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1991

  Incluir item