Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2933730 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Laura M Vowels (0000-0001-5594-2095, University of Lausanne, autor correspondente), Matthew J Vowels (0000-0002-8811-1156, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Kristen P Mark (0000-0002-0524-3357, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1191-1212 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02654075211047004 |
| OpenAlex | W4205527822 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 48 |
Sexual satisfaction has been robustly associated with relationship and individual well-being. Previous studies have found several individual (e.g., gender, self-esteem, and attachment) and relational (e.g., relationship satisfaction, relationship length, and sexual desire) factors that predict sexual satisfaction. The aim of the present study was to identify which variables are the strongest, and the least strong, predictors of sexual satisfaction using modern machine learning. Previous research has relied primarily on traditional statistical models which are limited in their ability to estimate a large number of predictors, non-linear associations, and complex interactions. Through a machine learning algorithm, random forest (a potentially more flexible extension of decision trees), we predicted sexual satisfaction across two samples (total N = 1846; includes 754 individuals forming 377 couples). We also used a game theoretic interpretation technique, Shapley values, which allowed us to estimate the size and direction of the effect of each predictor variable on the model outcome. Findings showed that sexual satisfaction is highly predictable (48-62% of variance explained) with relationship variables (relationship satisfaction, importance of sex in relationship, romantic love, and dyadic desire) explaining the most variance in sexual satisfaction. The study highlighted important factors to focus on in future research and interventions
Developmental psychology · Explained variation · Psychological intervention · Romance · Statistics · Variables · Variance (accounting · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Mathematics · Psychology · Sexual function and dysfunction studies · Social Psychology
A machine learning approach for analyzing sexual satisfaction based on psychological features
Secondary School Students’ Views on Sexuality and Sexual Health Education
Relation Between Desire and Sexual Satisfaction in Different Typologies of Adherence to the Sexual Double Standard
Associations of Individual and Dyadic Aspects of Sexual Self-Esteem with Sexual Function Problems in Mixed-Sex Couples
A Study of the Dyadic Associations of Self-Compassion on Sexual Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction
Looking Beyond the Chair
Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning
Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Depressed Adults and Development of a Short Form
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies
Statistical Modeling
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology
A systematic review of sexual satisfaction
The sexual desire inventory
Using a Different Model for Female Sexual Response to Address Women's Problematic Low Sexual Desire
The Relationship Between Self-Reported Sexual Satisfaction and General Well-Being in Women
The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-Short Form
Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Random Forests
Are Couples More Satisfied When They Match in Sexual Desire? New Insights From Response Surface Analyses
Day-to-Day Changes in Intimacy Predict Heightened Relationship Passion, Sexual Occurrence, and Sexual Satisfaction
Sexual satisfaction in long‐term heterosexual relationships
Who is the “Self” in Self Reports of Sexual Satisfaction? Research and Policy Implications
What do you mean when you say that you are sexually satisfied?” A mixed methods study
Sexual Satisfaction and Sexual Health Among University Students in the United States
A scale for the comparison of the sexual attitudes of adolescents and their parents
What is Sexual Satisfaction? Thematic Analysis of Lay People's Definitions
Sexuality Examined Through the Lens of Attachment Theory
Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships
Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction
A Dyadic Approach to Understanding the Link Between Sexual Functioning and Sexual Satisfaction in Heterosexual Couples
Measurement of romantic love
Body Satisfaction and Couple’s Daily Sexual Experience
Longitudinal Associations Among Relationship Satisfaction, Sexual Satisfaction, and Frequency of Sex in Early Marriage
Does Sexual Satisfaction Change With Relationship Duration
Correlates of Increased Sexual Satisfaction
A Cross-National Study of Subjective Sexual Well-Being Among Older Women and Men
Accounting for Women's Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships
Identifying the strongest self-report predictors of sexual satisfaction using machine learning
Linking Romantic Love with Sex
Giving in the bedroom
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,75 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |