Did relationship quality during the Covid-19 pandemic vary across cultural contexts
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2937041 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Paula R Pietromonaco (0000-0003-1569-0246, University of Massachusetts, USA, autor correspondente), Matthew D Hammond (0000-0001-8095-6093, Victoria University of Wellington), Nickola C Overall (0000-0002-9703-4383, University of Auckland), Giulia Zoppolat (0000-0002-2338-4225, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands), Rhonda N Balzarini, Rhonda Balzarini (0000-0001-7443-1266, Texas State University), Richard B Slatcher (0000-0001-6392-4161, University of Georgia) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 9 |
| Páginas | 2522-2547 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02654075241248394 |
| OpenAlex | W4394930715 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 71 |
We examined whether the impact of the pandemic on couple relationships varied across cultural contexts. Following from studies showing better outcomes (lower disease risk, greater well-being) within cultures higher in tightness (having strong norms promoting conformity) or collectivism (vs. individualism), we predicted that tighter and more collectivistic contexts would be associated with better relationship functioning. Preregistered analyses using existing data collected during the pandemic ( N = 2510; 12 countries), indicated, counter to predictions, that individuals from countries higher in tightness or collectivism evidenced greater relationship conflict. Cultural context was unrelated to relationship quality. Stress, attachment insecurity, and perceived partner responsiveness predicted relationship quality during the pandemic, but cultural context generally did not moderate these links. Perceived partner responsiveness, however, predicted relationship quality more strongly within more collectivistic (vs. more individualistic) countries. We discuss possible explanations for these findings, limitations of the data, and the need for larger studies including a broader range of countries, individuals, and cultural contexts
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Outbreak · Pandemic · Quality (philosophy · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Cultural Differences and Values · Medicine · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Virology
Introducing Multilevel Modeling
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies
The experiences in close relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire
Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states
What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships?
Conflict in the Development of Close Relationships
Cultural Practices Emphasize Influence in the United States and Adjustment in Japan
On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.
The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and Covid-19 cases and deaths
The Panas-X
The Measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components
Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures
Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling
Freedom Rising
Relationship satisfaction during Covid ‐19
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Change in Close Relationships
Love in the Time of Covid
Partners’ Attachment Insecurity and Stress Predict Poorer Relationship Functioning During Covid-19 Quarantines
Attachment avoidance and the cultural fit hypothesis
Impact of Societal Culture on Covid-19 Morbidity and Mortality across Countries
The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability
Preparing for Future Adversities
Different bumps in the road
A descriptive literature review of early research on Covid-19 and close relationships
How sociocultural contexts may shape the impact of the Covid ‐19 pandemic on couples' relationships
Changes in employment and relationship satisfaction in times of the Covid-19 pandemic
Globalisation and acculturation
Applying relationship science to evaluate how the Covid-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker)
Sex Differences in Self-Construal and in Depressive Symptoms
How You Talk About It Matters
Culture and the self
Socio-Cultural Values Are Risk Factors for Covid-19-Related Mortality
Culture, gender, and self
Extraversion, social interactions, and well-being during the Covid-19 pandemic
Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender
Culture and Social Support
Adherence to emotion norms is greater in individualist cultures than in collectivist cultures
The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes
Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States
Did relationship quality during the Covid-19 pandemic vary across cultural contexts
Individualism and collectivism as moderators of the association between attachment insecurities, coping, and social support
Dynamic associations between stress and relationship functioning in the wake of Covid-19
Enduring Covid-19 lockdowns
Emotion suppression on relationship and life satisfaction
Coping with global uncertainty
A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations
Research on Marital Satisfaction and Stability in the 2010s
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |