Defending the role of rationality in the social sciences, rationally
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3075701 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tibor Rutar (0000-0002-5022-0373, University of Maribor, Slovenia, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 575-579 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Science Information (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0539-0184 • E-ISSN: 1461-7412 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0539018420963444 |
| OpenAlex | W3099553262 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
Peter T. Leeson and Tobias Wolbring agree with me that rationality, properly clarified, should continue to assume an important theoretical role in modern social science. We disagree, however, about the precise extent of its role. In my reply to the debate I focus on two related issues that have emerged. First, can and should the concepts of rationality, or rational choice theory (RCT) more generally, be employed as something more than just one tool among many? Second, can all cases of norm-following be satisfactorily subsumed by rationality and RCT analysis
Ecological rationality · Economics · Epistemology · Great Rationality Debate · Positive economics · Principle of rationality · Rationality · Sociology · Critical Realism in Sociology · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Social and Cultural Dynamics
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |