Sanchismo
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3093073 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anne Pyburn (Indiana University, autor correspondente), Anne K Pyburn |
| Ano | 2005 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Data de publicação | 2005-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Ethnologia Europaea (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0425-4597 • E-ISSN: 1604-3030 |
| Editora | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.16995/ee.997 |
| OpenAlex | W4245311256 |
| Idioma | EN |
Substantivism and formalism have been tossed around by anthropologists for many decades. Are people basically rational and guided by the logic of their cultural context, or irrational and guided by belief at the expense of observation? So far the answer appears to be “yes.” These two perspectives have never died out of anthropology, and one of these two beliefs about human nature can be teased out of most treatises (Wilk 1996). Hobbes vs. Locke, Weber vs. Durkheim, Lévi-Strauss vs. Evans-Pritchard; for Bruno Latour (1993), we have never been rational; for Marshall Sahlins natives think differently (1995); for Eric Wolf it is the anthropologists who are irrational (1982)
Art · Epistemology · Irrational number · Literature · Sociology · Anthropology · Educational and Social Studies · Italian Literature and Culture · Italian Social Issues and Migration · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |