Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The "Intensity" Problem and Democratic Theory

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3763174
AutoresWillmoore Kendall (University of Dallas), George W Carey (Georgetown University)
Ano1968
Volume62
Fascículo1
Páginas5-24
Data de publicação1968-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1953323
OpenAlexW4254497894
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas19
Referências citadas3

Dinner is over. Mr. and Mrs. Jones and Mr. and Mrs. Smith are having coffee. The question arises: What shall we do this evening? Play bridge? Go to the movies? Listen to some chamber music from the local FM station? Sit and chat? Each, in due course, expresses a "preference" among these four alternatives but with this difference: Mr. and Mrs. Jones and Mrs. Smith, though each has a preference, "don't much care." Their preferences are "mild" or "marginal." Not so Mr. Smith. His preference is "strong." He is tired, couldn't possibly get his mind on bridge, or muster the energies for going out to a movie. He has listened to chamber music all afternoon while working on an architectural problem, and couldn't bear any more. If the group does anything other than sit and chat, he at least will do it grudgingly. He "cares enormously" which alternative is chosen.Now: which is the "correct" choice among the four alternatives? Which, "distributive justice" to one side, is the choice most likely to preserve good relations among the members of the group? Some theorists, it would seem, find these two questions easy to answer. Mr. Smith ought to have his way, and good relations are likely to be endangered if he does not; and these answers are equally valid whether the other three all prefer the same thing or prefer different things. Since, for the latter, the choice is a matter of indifference, it is both "more fair" and "more expedient" (less likely to lead to a quarrel) for the group to do what Mr. Smith prefers to do

Aesthetics · Bridge (graph theory · Economics · Evening · Preference · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Organized Interests and the Prospects of a Global Democracy

    Open Access•Leif Lewin•Democratic Theory•2017

  • Contestation and participation

    Open Access•Vanessa A Boese, Matthew C Wilson•International Area Studies Review•2022

  • Establishing a Constitutional Court? An alternative political culture approach – the Israeli case

    Open Access•Gideon Doron, Assaf Meydani•Policy and Society•2007

  • The multiple self in democracy

    Felipe Rey•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • The Apsa and Minority Representation

    Steven J Bram•PS Political Science & Politics•1970

  • Conceptualizing Bureaucratic Responsiveness

    Open Access•Grace Hall Saltzstein•Administration & Society•1985

  • Demand functions and the valuation of public goods

    Open Access•Eli M Noam•Public Choice•1982

  • Structural Sources of Unequal Responsiveness to Group Demands in American Cities

    Open Access•Paul Schumaker, Russell W Getter•The Western Political Quarterly•1983

  • Why are small Island States Democracies

    Dag Anckar•The Round Table•2002

  • Nazis in Skokie

    Cary Federman•Communication and Democracy•2023

  • A Note On Social Cleavages and Democratic Performance

    Open Access•Harold D Clarke, Allan Kornberg•Comparative Political Studies•1971

  • Size, Insularity and Democracy

    Open Access•Dag Anckar, Carsten Anckar•Scandinavian Political Studies•1995

  • Majoritarian and Consensus Democracy

    Open Access•Leif Lewin•Scandinavian Political Studies•1998

  • The rise and decline of corporatism

    Open Access•Leif Lewin•European Journal of Political…•1994

  • On Analysing the Impact of the Electoral System on the Party System in Canada

    Open Access•J A A Lovink•Canadian Journal of Political…•1970

  • The Limits of Consensual Decision

    Open Access•Douglas W Rae•American Political Science Review•1975

  • Direct Legislation

    Open Access•Howard D Hamilton•American Political Science Review•1970

  • Justifying Justice

    Open Access•Benjamin R Barber•American Political Science Review•1975

  • Local Organized Interests and the 1996 Cincinnati Sports Stadia Tax Referendum

    Open Access•Clyde Brown, David M Paul•Journal of Sport and Social Issues•1999

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • Democracy and the American Party System

    Austin Ranney, Willmoore Kendall•The Western Political Quarterly•1956

  • John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule

    James L Godfrey, Willmoore Kendall•Social Forces•1942

Obras citantes distintas19
Citações por ano0,34
Intervalo de citações1970 - 2025 (56)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 19
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae