Conclusions
What future for the Treaty of Lisbon
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4447339 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ariadna Ripoll, Ariadna Ripoll Servent (0000-0002-1399-6535, University of Salzburg, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | e72661 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-05-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Política y Sociedad (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1130-8001 • E-ISSN: 1988-3129 |
| Editora | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5209/poso.72661 |
| OpenAlex | W3160479715 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
This conclusion to the special issue reflects on the evolution of European integration since the early 1990s in order to better understand the contested origins of the Treaty of Lisbon and the consequences the latter have had for the EU's political system. It considers the various contributions of the special issue and shows how the Treaty emerged in an era of shifting cleavages, disputed steps towards a more political Union and rising populism. This legacy has led to more polarisation and politicisation - a phenomenon that the Treaty of Lisbon struggles to encapsulate and conciliate with the culture of consensus and compromise inherent to its institutional structures. As a result, we observe a bias towards policy stability - and even failure - that affects the legitimacy and democratic standards of the European Union. In a context of polycrisis, the difficulty to find compromises - especially in highly normative issues - leads to the de-politicisation of the EU and reinforces the gap between EU institutions and its citizens. The COVID-19 pandemic is a window of opportunity for the EU, in which to choose between integration and disintegration; between values and inaction
Compromise · Context (archaeology · Democracy · Democratic legitimacy · Economics · European integration · European union · Geography · International trade · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Maastricht Treaty · Normative · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Treaty · Treaty of Lisbon · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Politicising Europe
The New Intergovernmentalism
Accountability, Dependency, and EU Agencies
Framing immobility
The Joint‐decision Trap
A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration
Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe
What is intergovernmental about the EU’s ‘(new) intergovernmentalist’ turn? Evidence from the Eurozone and asylum crises
To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-Related Activities in National Parliaments
The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis
Engaging the disengaged? Explaining the participation of Eurosceptic MEPs in trilogue negotiations
Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises
Introduction
More integration, less federation
A Matter of Supply and Demand
Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration
EU Actors under pressure
Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises
Drifting Further Apart
States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics
A New Form of Delegation in EU Asylum
The Communitarization of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
Concluding Early Agreements in the EU
What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,25 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |